Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Perceptual Video Quality Assessment: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03413 v1 pith:KNMWF644 submitted 2024-02-05 cs.MM cs.CVeess.IV

classification cs.MMcs.CVeess.IV
keywords videoqualityassessmentmeasuresobjectivesurveycontentfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Perceptual video quality assessment plays a vital role in the field of video processing due to the existence of quality degradations introduced in various stages of video signal acquisition, compression, transmission and display. With the advancement of internet communication and cloud service technology, video content and traffic are growing exponentially, which further emphasizes the requirement for accurate and rapid assessment of video quality. Therefore, numerous subjective and objective video quality assessment studies have been conducted over the past two decades for both generic videos and specific videos such as streaming, user-generated content (UGC), 3D, virtual and augmented reality (VR and AR), high frame rate (HFR), audio-visual, etc. This survey provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of these video quality assessment studies. Specifically, we first review the subjective video quality assessment methodologies and databases, which are necessary for validating the performance of video quality metrics. Second, the objective video quality assessment algorithms for general purposes are surveyed and concluded according to the methodologies utilized in the quality measures. Third, we overview the objective video quality assessment measures for specific applications and emerging topics. Finally, the performances of the state-of-the-art video quality assessment measures are compared and analyzed. This survey provides a systematic overview of both classical works and recent progresses in the realm of video quality assessment, which can help other researchers quickly access the field and conduct relevant research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quality Assessment and Distortion-aware Saliency Prediction for AI-Generated Omnidirectional Images

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors introduce OHF2024, a human-annotated database of AI-generated omnidirectional images, and BLIP2OIQA plus BLIP2OISal models that achieve the best reported scores on this database for multi-perspective quali...

Pith tools