Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multimodal Rationales for Explainable Visual Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03896 v3 pith:4RBTI3UL submitted 2024-02-06 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords visualansweringrationalesanswersexplainablemrvqaquestiontextual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a challenging task of predicting the answer to a question about the content of an image. Prior works directly evaluate the answering models by simply calculating the accuracy of predicted answers. However, the inner reasoning behind the predictions is disregarded in such a "black box" system, and we cannot ascertain the trustworthiness of the predictions. Even more concerning, in some cases, these models predict correct answers despite focusing on irrelevant visual regions or textual tokens. To develop an explainable and trustworthy answering system, we propose a novel model termed MRVQA (Multimodal Rationales for VQA), which provides visual and textual rationales to support its predicted answers. To measure the quality of generated rationales, a new metric vtS (visual-textual Similarity) score is introduced from both visual and textual perspectives. Considering the extra annotations distinct from standard VQA, MRVQA is trained and evaluated using samples synthesized from some existing datasets. Extensive experiments across three EVQA datasets demonstrate that MRVQA achieves new state-of-the-art results through additional rationale generation, enhancing the trustworthiness of the explainable VQA model. The code and the synthesized dataset are released under https://github.com/lik1996/MRVQA2025.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spatially Grounded Explanations in Vision Language Models for Document Visual Question Answering

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EaGERS uses a vision language model's own explanation to mask a document image to relevant grid regions, then re-asks the question, improving DocVQA accuracy while grounding answers spatially.

Pith tools