Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Bias-Variance Decomposition for Ensembles over Multiple Synthetic Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03985 v3 pith:YO2OEPMS submitted 2024-02-06 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords syntheticdatasetsmultipletheoryaccuracybenefitsbias-varianceerror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of generating multiple synthetic datasets for supervised learning, from increased accuracy to more effective model selection and uncertainty estimation. These benefits have clear empirical support, but the theoretical understanding of them is currently very light. We seek to increase the theoretical understanding by deriving bias-variance decompositions for several settings of using multiple synthetic datasets, including differentially private synthetic data. Our theory yields a simple rule of thumb to select the appropriate number of synthetic datasets in the case of mean-squared error and Brier score. We investigate how our theory works in practice with several real datasets, downstream predictors and error metrics. As our theory predicts, multiple synthetic datasets often improve accuracy, while a single large synthetic dataset gives at best minimal improvement, showing that our insights are practically relevant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Provably Improving Generalization of Few-Shot Models with Synthetic Data

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a theory-inspired loss that minimizes real-synthetic prediction discrepancy and local robustness, and reports state-of-the-art few-shot accuracy, but the main bound is not a valid guarantee for the ...

Pith tools