REVIEW 1 cited by
A Bias-Variance Decomposition for Ensembles over Multiple Synthetic Datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of generating multiple synthetic datasets for supervised learning, from increased accuracy to more effective model selection and uncertainty estimation. These benefits have clear empirical support, but the theoretical understanding of them is currently very light. We seek to increase the theoretical understanding by deriving bias-variance decompositions for several settings of using multiple synthetic datasets, including differentially private synthetic data. Our theory yields a simple rule of thumb to select the appropriate number of synthetic datasets in the case of mean-squared error and Brier score. We investigate how our theory works in practice with several real datasets, downstream predictors and error metrics. As our theory predicts, multiple synthetic datasets often improve accuracy, while a single large synthetic dataset gives at best minimal improvement, showing that our insights are practically relevant.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Provably Improving Generalization of Few-Shot Models with Synthetic Data
The paper proposes a theory-inspired loss that minimizes real-synthetic prediction discrepancy and local robustness, and reports state-of-the-art few-shot accuracy, but the main bound is not a valid guarantee for the ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.