Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The AGORA High-resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project IV: Halo and Galaxy Mass Assembly in a Cosmological Zoom-in Simulation at $z\le2$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.06202 v1 pith:JD3SA36D submitted 2024-02-09 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAphysics.comp-ph

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAphysics.comp-ph
keywords codesgalaxysimulationsdifferenceshalomasssimulationagora
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this fourth paper from the AGORA Collaboration, we study the evolution down to redshift $z=2$ and below of a set of cosmological zoom-in simulations of a Milky Way mass galaxy by eight of the leading hydrodynamic simulation codes. We also compare this CosmoRun suite of simulations with dark matter-only simulations by the same eight codes. We analyze general properties of the halo and galaxy at $z=4$ and 3, and before the last major merger, focusing on the formation of well-defined rotationally-supported disks, the mass-metallicity relation, the specific star formation rate, the gas metallicity gradients, and the non-axisymmetric structures in the stellar disks. Codes generally converge well to the stellar-to-halo mass ratios predicted by semi-analytic models at $z\sim$2. We see that almost all the hydro codes develop rotationally-supported structures at low redshifts. Most agree within 0.5 dex with the observed MZR at high and intermediate redshifts, and reproduce the gas metallicity gradients obtained from analytical models and low-redshift observations. We confirm that the inter-code differences in the halo assembly history reported in the first paper of the collaboration also exist in CosmoRun, making the code-to-code comparison more difficult. We show that such differences are mainly due to variations in code-dependent parameters that control the time-stepping strategy of the gravity solver. We find that variations in the early stellar feedback can also result in differences in the timing of the low-redshift mergers. All the simulation data down to $z=2$ and the auxiliary data will be made publicly available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Theoretical Predictions for the Inner Dark Matter Distribution in the Milky Way Informed by Simulations

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Milky Way's inner dark matter density slope is predicted to lie between -0.5 and -1.3, and the 5-degree J-factor range is 0.8-30 x 10^23 GeV^2/cm^5.

  2. Cosmological Simulations of Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-07 unverdicted

    A comprehensive introductory review of cosmological galaxy simulation methods, covering initial conditions, numerical solvers, star formation and feedback, analysis, and validation.

Pith tools