REVIEW 2 cited by
More Benefits of Being Distributional: Second-Order Bounds for Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we prove that Distributional Reinforcement Learning (DistRL), which learns the return distribution, can obtain second-order bounds in both online and offline RL in general settings with function approximation. Second-order bounds are instance-dependent bounds that scale with the variance of return, which we prove are tighter than the previously known small-loss bounds of distributional RL. To the best of our knowledge, our results are the first second-order bounds for low-rank MDPs and for offline RL. When specializing to contextual bandits (one-step RL problem), we show that a distributional learning based optimism algorithm achieves a second-order worst-case regret bound, and a second-order gap dependent bound, simultaneously. We also empirically demonstrate the benefit of DistRL in contextual bandits on real-world datasets. We highlight that our analysis with DistRL is relatively simple, follows the general framework of optimism in the face of uncertainty and does not require weighted regression. Our results suggest that DistRL is a promising framework for obtaining second-order bounds in general RL settings, thus further reinforcing the benefits of DistRL.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Catoni Contextual Bandits are Robust to Heavy-tailed Rewards
Contextual bandits with general function approximation can achieve regret scaling with cumulative reward variance and only logarithmically with the reward range, using Catoni robust mean estimators, with a matching lo...
-
Value Flows
Value Flows fits the full return distribution in RL with a flow-matching critic and reweights its learning objective by estimated return variance; the central theoretical guarantee does not follow from the stated equations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.