pith. sign in

arxiv: 2402.09591 · v3 · submitted 2024-02-14 · 💻 cs.LG · math.PR

Reconstructing the Geometry of Random Geometric Graphs

Han Huang , Pakawut Jiradilok , Elchanan Mossel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 03:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG math.PR
keywords random geometric graphsmanifold learninggeometry reconstructiongraph-based inferencelow-dimensional manifoldsdistance monotonicityconnectivity recovery
0
0 comments X

The pith

From a random geometric graph sampled on a low-dimensional manifold, the underlying geometry can be efficiently reconstructed when edge probability is a strictly decreasing function of Euclidean distance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the edges of a random geometric graph alone suffice to recover the geometry of the hidden low-dimensional manifold on which the points lie. This holds provided the manifold is embedded in Euclidean space and the probability of connecting two points decreases strictly with their distance in that embedding. The result extends manifold learning, which typically requires the points themselves and approximate distances, to the setting where only the connectivity graph is observed. A reader would care because many networks can be modeled as geometric graphs on unknown spaces, so the work gives a route to infer the space from observed links. The method is efficient under the stated assumptions.

Core claim

We show how to efficiently reconstruct the geometry of the underlying space from the sampled graph under the manifold assumption, i.e., assuming that the underlying space is a low dimensional manifold and that the connection probability is a strictly decreasing function of the Euclidean distance between the points in a given embedding of the manifold in R^N. Our work complements a large body of work on manifold learning, where the goal is to recover a manifold from sampled points sampled in the manifold along with their (approximate) distances.

What carries the argument

An efficient reconstruction procedure that uses the strict monotonicity between connection probability and Euclidean distance to recover relative positions and the embedding of the manifold from the adjacency matrix alone.

If this is right

  • Manifold learning becomes possible from connectivity data without access to point coordinates or explicit distances.
  • The geometry of the hidden space can be recovered in any network that arises as a random geometric graph under the monotonicity condition.
  • Reconstruction works for any embedding dimension N as long as the intrinsic dimension is low and the monotonicity assumption holds.
  • The method separates the problem of geometry recovery from the separate problem of estimating the connection function itself.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same monotonicity property might allow partial recovery when the graph is observed with missing or spurious edges.
  • The result suggests that distance information is implicitly encoded in the degree sequence and neighborhood overlaps of such graphs.
  • Applications could include inferring latent spaces in social or biological networks where only interaction data are available.

Load-bearing premise

The probability of an edge must be a strictly decreasing function of Euclidean distance in the given embedding of the manifold.

What would settle it

A concrete counter-example consisting of a known low-dimensional manifold, a strictly decreasing connection function, a sampled point set, and the resulting graph on which the reconstruction procedure returns a geometry inconsistent with the original embedding.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2402.09591 by Elchanan Mossel, Han Huang, Pakawut Jiradilok.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Two closed curves. 2.2.4. Remark on the choice of ℓp with dependency on M. Let Ma and Mb denote two embedded manifolds within R 2 , characterized by the configurations depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Random geometric graphs are random graph models defined on metric spaces. Such a model is defined by first sampling points from a metric space and then connecting each pair of sampled points with probability that depends on their distance, independently among pairs. In this work, we show how to efficiently reconstruct the geometry of the underlying space from the sampled graph under the manifold assumption, i.e., assuming that the underlying space is a low dimensional manifold and that the connection probability is a strictly decreasing function of the Euclidean distance between the points in a given embedding of the manifold in $\mathbb{R}^N$. Our work complements a large body of work on manifold learning, where the goal is to recover a manifold from sampled points sampled in the manifold along with their (approximate) distances.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims an efficient algorithm exists to reconstruct the geometry (i.e., recover an embedding up to isometry) of a low-dimensional manifold from a single sample of a random geometric graph on that manifold, under the assumption that the edge probability is a strictly decreasing function of Euclidean distance in some embedding of the manifold into R^N. The work positions itself as complementary to distance-based manifold learning methods.

Significance. If the claimed reconstruction procedure is correct and polynomial-time, the result would supply a graph-only route to manifold recovery that does not require explicit distance measurements, potentially broadening the applicability of manifold learning to connectivity-only data sets. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are mentioned in the provided text.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that an 'efficient reconstruction method exists' is stated without any description of the algorithm, its complexity, or the precise output (e.g., coordinates up to rigid motion).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. We address the points in the summary and significance assessment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript claims an efficient algorithm exists to reconstruct the geometry (i.e., recover an embedding up to isometry) of a low-dimensional manifold from a single sample of a random geometric graph on that manifold, under the assumption that the edge probability is a strictly decreasing function of Euclidean distance in some embedding of the manifold into R^N. The work positions itself as complementary to distance-based manifold learning methods.

    Authors: This is an accurate description of the main result. The paper gives a polynomial-time algorithm that, with high probability over the graph sampling, recovers an embedding isometric to the original manifold embedding, using only the observed edges and the stated assumptions on the connection probability. revision: no

  2. Referee: If the claimed reconstruction procedure is correct and polynomial-time, the result would supply a graph-only route to manifold recovery that does not require explicit distance measurements, potentially broadening the applicability of manifold learning to connectivity-only data sets.

    Authors: We agree this is the intended contribution. The analysis shows both correctness (recovery up to isometry) and polynomial runtime in the number of vertices under the manifold and monotonicity assumptions. revision: no

  3. Referee: No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are mentioned in the provided text.

    Authors: The manuscript contains full mathematical proofs of correctness and complexity. As a purely theoretical work, machine-checked proofs and code are not included; the derivations hold for any strictly decreasing connection probability and require no additional parameters. We can add a clarifying sentence or supply code upon request. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents an algorithmic result for reconstructing manifold geometry from random geometric graphs under explicit assumptions (low-dimensional manifold embedded in R^N with strictly decreasing connection probability in Euclidean distance). No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the central claim is an independent reconstruction procedure that complements (rather than derives from) existing manifold learning methods. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two domain assumptions stated in the abstract: the data-generating process is a low-dimensional manifold and connection probability is strictly monotone in Euclidean distance within some embedding.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption the underlying space is a low dimensional manifold
    Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the manifold assumption required for the reconstruction.
  • domain assumption the connection probability is a strictly decreasing function of the Euclidean distance between the points in a given embedding of the manifold in R^N
    Stated directly in the abstract as part of the model definition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5655 in / 1287 out tokens · 28214 ms · 2026-05-24T03:54:46.910984+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Latent distance estimation for random geometric graphs

    Ernesto Araya and Yohann De Castro. Latent distance estimation for random geometric graphs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 32, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    A note on estimating the dimension from a random geometric graph

    Caelan Atamanchuk, Luc Devroye, and G\' a bor Lugosi. A note on estimating the dimension from a random geometric graph. arXiv:2311.13059 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13059 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Random geometric graph: some recent developments and perspectives

    Quentin Duchemin and Yohann De Castro. Random geometric graph: some recent developments and perspectives. In High dimensional probability IX ---the ethereal volume , volume 80 of Progr. Probab. , pages 347--392. Birkh\" a user/Springer, Cham, [2023] 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Community detection and percolation of information in a geometric setting

    Ronen Eldan, Dan Mikulincer, and Hester Pieters. Community detection and percolation of information in a geometric setting. Combin. Probab. Comput. , 31(6):1048--1069, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Reconstruction and interpolation of manifolds

    Charles Fefferman, Sergei Ivanov, Yaroslav Kurylev, Matti Lassas, and Hariharan Narayanan. Reconstruction and interpolation of manifolds. I : T he geometric W hitney problem. Found. Comput. Math. , 20(5):1035--1133, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Reconstruction and interpolation of manifolds II : I nverse problems for R iemannian manifolds with partial distance data

    Charles Fefferman, Sergei Ivanov, Matti Lassas, Jinpeng Lu, and Hariharan Narayanan. Reconstruction and interpolation of manifolds II : I nverse problems for R iemannian manifolds with partial distance data. arXiv:2111.14528 https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.14528 , 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Reconstruction of a R iemannian manifold from noisy intrinsic distances

    Charles Fefferman, Sergei Ivanov, Matti Lassas, and Hariharan Narayanan. Reconstruction of a R iemannian manifold from noisy intrinsic distances. SIAM J. Math. Data Sci. , 2(3):770--808, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Fitting a manifold to data in the presence of large noise

    Charles Fefferman, Sergei Ivanov, Matti Lassas, and Hariharan Narayanan. Fitting a manifold to data in the presence of large noise. arXiv:2312.10598 https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10598 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Chao Gao, Yu Lu, and Harrison H. Zhou. Rate-optimal graphon estimation. Ann. Statist. , 43(6):2624--2652, 2015

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Manifold learning in wasserstein space

    Keaton Hamm, Caroline Moosm\" u ller, Bernhard Schmitzer, and Matthew Thorpe. Manifold learning in wasserstein space. arXiv:2311.08549 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08549 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Localization from incomplete noisy distance measurements

    Adel Javanmard and Andrea Montanari. Localization from incomplete noisy distance measurements. Found. Comput. Math. , 13(3):297--345, 2013

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Testing thresholds for high-dimensional sparse random geometric graphs

    Siqi Liu, Sidhanth Mohanty, Tselil Schramm, and Elizabeth Yang. Testing thresholds for high-dimensional sparse random geometric graphs. In S TOC '22--- P roceedings of the 54th A nnual ACM SIGACT S ymposium on T heory of C omputing , pages 672--677. ACM, New York, [2022] 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Spectral clustering in the gaussian mixture block model

    Shuangping Li and Tselil Schramm. Spectral clustering in the gaussian mixture block model. arXiv:2305.00979 https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00979 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Wein, and Shenduo Zhang

    Cheng Mao, Alexander S. Wein, and Shenduo Zhang. Detection-recovery gap for planted dense cycles. arXiv:2302.06737 https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06737 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Sensor network localization from local connectivity: Performance analysis for the mds-map algorithm

    Sewoong Oh, Andrea Montanari, and Amin Karbasi. Sensor network localization from local connectivity: Performance analysis for the mds-map algorithm. In 2010 IEEE Information Theory Workshop on Information Theory (ITW 2010, Cairo) , pages 1--5. IEEE, 2010

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Random geometric graphs , volume 5 of Oxford Studies in Probability

    Mathew Penrose. Random geometric graphs , volume 5 of Oxford Studies in Probability . Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    Metric measure geometry , volume 25 of IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics

    Takashi Shioya. Metric measure geometry , volume 25 of IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics . EMS Publishing House, Z\" u rich, 2016. Gromov's theory of convergence and concentration of metrics and measures

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Universally Consistent Latent Position Estimation and Vertex Classification for Random Dot Product Graphs

    Daniel L. Sussman, Minh Tang, and Carey E. Priebe. Universally consistent latent position estimation and vertex classification for random dot product graphs. arXiv:1207.6745 https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6745 , 2012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Sussman, and Carey E

    Minh Tang, Daniel L. Sussman, and Carey E. Priebe. Universally consistent vertex classification for latent positions graphs. Ann. Statist. , 41(3):1406--1430, 2013

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Manifold fitting

    Zhigang Yao, Jiaji Su, Bingjie Li, and Shing-Tung Yau. Manifold fitting. arXiv:2304.07680 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07680 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023