Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Mathematical Opportunities in Digital Twins (MATH-DT)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.10326 v2 pith:WOWYONIB submitted 2024-02-15 math.OC cs.NAmath.NAstat.ML

classification math.OCcs.NAmath.NAstat.ML
keywords mathematicalengineeringsystemapproachesdifferentdigitalmodelingmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The report describes the discussions from the Workshop on Mathematical Opportunities in Digital Twins (MATH-DT) from December 11-13, 2023, George Mason University. It illustrates that foundational Mathematical advances are required for Digital Twins (DTs) that are different from traditional approaches. A traditional model, in biology, physics, engineering or medicine, starts with a generic physical law (e.g., equations) and is often a simplification of reality. A DT starts with a specific ecosystem, object or person (e.g., personalized care) representing reality, requiring multi -scale, -physics modeling and coupling. Thus, these processes begin at opposite ends of the simulation and modeling pipeline, requiring different reliability criteria and uncertainty assessments. Additionally, unlike existing approaches, a DT assists humans to make decisions for the physical system, which (via sensors) in turn feeds data into the DT, and operates for the life of the physical system. While some of the foundational mathematical research can be done without a specific application context, one must also keep specific applications in mind for DTs. E.g., modeling a bridge or a biological system (a patient), or a socio-technical system (a city) is very different. The models range from differential equations (deterministic/uncertain) in engineering, to stochastic in biology, including agent-based. These are multi-scale hybrid models or large scale (multi-objective) optimization problems under uncertainty. There are no universal models or approaches. For e.g., Kalman filters for forecasting might work in engineering, but can fail in biomedical domain. Ad hoc studies, with limited systematic work, have shown that AI/ML methods can fail for simple engineering systems and can work well for biomedical problems. A list of `Mathematical Opportunities and Challenges' concludes the report.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Dynamic output-feedback stabilization of uncertain linear dynamics via digital twins

    math.OC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A digital twin with Bayesian parameter updates and Riccati gains stabilizes uncertain linear dynamics from partial noisy outputs when the estimate stays near the truth.

  2. Adjoint-based Recovery of Thermal Fields from Displacement or Strain Measurements

    math.OC 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A finite-element adjoint optimizer reconstructs thermal fields from displacement or strain measurements, outperforming temperature-only spatial interpolation in three synthetic civil-structure examples.

Pith tools