Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11175 v2 pith:SK5I5JBQ submitted 2024-02-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords detectionbenchmarktextm4gt-benchcontentevaluationidentifymachine-generated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought an unprecedented surge in machine-generated text (MGT) across diverse channels. This raises legitimate concerns about its potential misuse and societal implications. The need to identify and differentiate such content from genuine human-generated text is critical in combating disinformation, preserving the integrity of education and scientific fields, and maintaining trust in communication. In this work, we address this problem by introducing a new benchmark based on a multilingual, multi-domain, and multi-generator corpus of MGTs -- M4GT-Bench. The benchmark is compiled of three tasks: (1) mono-lingual and multi-lingual binary MGT detection; (2) multi-way detection where one need to identify, which particular model generated the text; and (3) mixed human-machine text detection, where a word boundary delimiting MGT from human-written content should be determined. On the developed benchmark, we have tested several MGT detection baselines and also conducted an evaluation of human performance. We see that obtaining good performance in MGT detection usually requires an access to the training data from the same domain and generators. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/M4GT-Bench.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectors

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning LLMs with DPO to push generated news and abstracts toward human style substantially reduces the F1 scores of state-of-the-art machine-generated text detectors.

  2. Synthetic Artifact Auditing: Tracing LLM-Generated Synthetic Data Usage in Downstream Applications

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-method auditing framework detects with roughly 87 to 97 percent accuracy whether classifiers, generators, and t-SNE plots were trained on or derived from LLM-generated synthetic data.

Pith tools