Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Random Projection Neural Networks of Best Approximation: Convergence theory and practical applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11397 v1 pith:7JZQQHKS submitted 2024-02-17 cs.LG cs.NAmath.NA

classification cs.LGcs.NAmath.NA
keywords approximationfunctionrpnnsconvergencebestdifferentiablefunctionsinfinitely
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the concept of Best Approximation for Feedforward Neural Networks (FNN) and explore their convergence properties through the lens of Random Projection (RPNNs). RPNNs have predetermined and fixed, once and for all, internal weights and biases, offering computational efficiency. We demonstrate that there exists a choice of external weights, for any family of such RPNNs, with non-polynomial infinitely differentiable activation functions, that exhibit an exponential convergence rate when approximating any infinitely differentiable function. For illustration purposes, we test the proposed RPNN-based function approximation, with parsimoniously chosen basis functions, across five benchmark function approximation problems. Results show that RPNNs achieve comparable performance to established methods such as Legendre Polynomials, highlighting their potential for efficient and accurate function approximation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving statistical learning methods via features selection without replacement sampling and random projection

    q-bio.QM 2025-05 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A routine feature-selection and random-subspace pipeline for brain cancer classification reports a 96% score, but the paper's own tables show 93.8% and the method is a known technique.

Pith tools