REVIEW 2 cited by
On the isomorphism problem for power semigroups
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Let $\mathcal P(S)$ be the semigroup obtained by equipping the family of all non-empty subsets of a (multiplicatively written) semigroup $S$ with the operation of setwise multiplication induced by $S$ itself. We call a subsemigroup $P$ of $\mathcal P(S)$ downward complete if any element of $S$ lies in at least one set $X \in P$ and any non-empty subset of a set in $P$ is still in $P$. We obtain, for a commutative semigroup $S$, a characterization of the cancellative elements of a downward complete subsemigroup of $\mathcal P(S)$ in terms of the cancellative elements of $S$. Consequently, we show that, if $H$ and $K$ are cancellative semigroups and either of them is commutative, then every isomorphism from a downward complete subsemigroup of $\mathcal P(H)$ to a downward complete subsemigroup of $\mathcal P(K)$ restricts to an isomorphism from $H$ to $K$. This solves a special case of a problem of Tamura and Shafer from the late 1960s and generalizes a recent result by Bienvenu and Geroldinger, where it is assumed, among other conditions, that $H$ and $K$ are numerical monoids.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On finitary power monoids of linearly orderable monoids
For linearly orderable monoids, quasi-ACCP and almost ACCP ascend to finitary power monoids, while atomicity, near atomicity, and quasi-atomicity do not; atomic power monoids are characterized as those from atomic MCD...
-
On primality and atomicity of numerical power monoids
Restricted numerical power monoids have no primal elements, and the distribution of atom sizes in P_fin,0(N_0) is asymptotically binomial with parameters n and 1/2.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.