Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CiMNet: Towards Joint Optimization for DNN Architecture and Configuration for Compute-In-Memory Hardware

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11780 v2 pith:IQFK2ADE submitted 2024-02-19 cs.AR cs.AI

classification cs.ARcs.AI
keywords hardwarearchitectureconfigurationsub-networksarchitecturesbandwidthcimnetexecution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the recent growth in demand for large-scale deep neural networks, compute in-memory (CiM) has come up as a prominent solution to alleviate bandwidth and on-chip interconnect bottlenecks that constrain Von-Neuman architectures. However, the construction of CiM hardware poses a challenge as any specific memory hierarchy in terms of cache sizes and memory bandwidth at different interfaces may not be ideally matched to any neural network's attributes such as tensor dimension and arithmetic intensity, thus leading to suboptimal and under-performing systems. Despite the success of neural architecture search (NAS) techniques in yielding efficient sub-networks for a given hardware metric budget (e.g., DNN execution time or latency), it assumes the hardware configuration to be frozen, often yielding sub-optimal sub-networks for a given budget. In this paper, we present CiMNet, a framework that jointly searches for optimal sub-networks and hardware configurations for CiM architectures creating a Pareto optimal frontier of downstream task accuracy and execution metrics (e.g., latency). The proposed framework can comprehend the complex interplay between a sub-network's performance and the CiM hardware configuration choices including bandwidth, processing element size, and memory size. Exhaustive experiments on different model architectures from both CNN and Transformer families demonstrate the efficacy of the CiMNet in finding co-optimized sub-networks and CiM hardware configurations. Specifically, for similar ImageNet classification accuracy as baseline ViT-B, optimizing only the model architecture increases performance (or reduces workload execution time) by 1.7x while optimizing for both the model architecture and hardware configuration increases it by 3.1x.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools