REVIEW 4 cited by
Understanding the Therapeutic Relationship between Counselors and Clients in Online Text-based Counseling using LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Robust therapeutic relationships between counselors and clients are fundamental to counseling effectiveness. The assessment of therapeutic alliance is well-established in traditional face-to-face therapy but may not directly translate to text-based settings. With millions of individuals seeking support through online text-based counseling, understanding the relationship in such contexts is crucial. In this paper, we present an automatic approach using large language models (LLMs) to understand the development of therapeutic alliance in text-based counseling. We adapt a theoretically grounded framework specifically to the context of online text-based counseling and develop comprehensive guidelines for characterizing the alliance. We collect a comprehensive counseling dataset and conduct multiple expert evaluations on a subset based on this framework. Our LLM-based approach, combined with guidelines and simultaneous extraction of supportive evidence underlying its predictions, demonstrates effectiveness in identifying the therapeutic alliance. Through further LLM-based evaluations on additional conversations, our findings underscore the challenges counselors face in cultivating strong online relationships with clients. Furthermore, we demonstrate the potential of LLM-based feedback mechanisms to enhance counselors' ability to build relationships, supported by a small-scale proof-of-concept.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
"I Don't Want My Mental Health App To Give Me Mental Health Barriers": Unpacking The Need For Digital Mental Health Tracking Services With And For The Blind Community
Blind users of mental health tracking apps face structural access barriers, including paywall-gated accessibility evaluation and inaccessible community features, even when they possess the relevant digital literacy.
-
"Is This Really a Human Peer Supporter?": Misalignments Between Peer Supporters and Experts in LLM-Supported Interactions
Mixed-methods studies of an LLM-supported peer support system uncover systematic misalignments where mental health experts flag critical safety and fidelity issues in peer responses that the supporters themselves do n...
-
Examining Spanish Counseling with MIDAS: a Motivational Interviewing Dataset in Spanish
MIDAS, a new expert-annotated Spanish motivational interviewing dataset, reveals language-specific counselor behaviors and supports Spanish-language behavior classification.
-
Harnessing Large Language Models for Mental Health: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations
A narrative review of how large language models might help and harm mental health care, concluding that ethical safeguards and human oversight are needed.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.