REVIEW 4 cited by
Backdoor Attacks on Dense Retrieval via Public and Unintentional Triggers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Dense retrieval systems have been widely used in various NLP applications. However, their vulnerabilities to potential attacks have been underexplored. This paper investigates a novel attack scenario where the attackers aim to mislead the retrieval system into retrieving the attacker-specified contents. Those contents, injected into the retrieval corpus by attackers, can include harmful text like hate speech or spam. Unlike prior methods that rely on model weights and generate conspicuous, unnatural outputs, we propose a covert backdoor attack triggered by grammar errors. Our approach ensures that the attacked models can function normally for standard queries while covertly triggering the retrieval of the attacker's contents in response to minor linguistic mistakes. Specifically, dense retrievers are trained with contrastive loss and hard negative sampling. Surprisingly, our findings demonstrate that contrastive loss is notably sensitive to grammatical errors, and hard negative sampling can exacerbate susceptibility to backdoor attacks. Our proposed method achieves a high attack success rate with a minimal corpus poisoning rate of only 0.048\%, while preserving normal retrieval performance. This indicates that the method has negligible impact on user experience for error-free queries. Furthermore, evaluations across three real-world defense strategies reveal that the malicious passages embedded within the corpus remain highly resistant to detection and filtering, underscoring the robustness and subtlety of the proposed attack \footnote{Codes of this work are available at https://github.com/ruyue0001/Backdoor_DPR.}.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Paladin: Defending LLM-enabled Phishing Emails with a New Trigger-Tag Paradigm
A trigger-tag watermark embedded by fine-tuning lets modified LLMs mark their own phishing outputs for cheap detection.
-
Epistemic Bias Injection: Manipulating LLM Opinion via Selective Context Retrieval
Factually correct but one-sided passages injected into a RAG database can shift LLM answers toward an attacker's stance, and a PCA/KL-based filter (BiasDef) reduces that shift.
-
UniC-RAG: Universal Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation
A universal knowledge-corruption attack uses as few as 100 crafted texts to hijack responses to thousands of diverse user queries in retrieval-augmented generation.
-
PRA-RAG: Provably Robust Aggregation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation against Retrieval Corruption
PRA-RAG is a new aggregation algorithm for RAG that claims provable robustness bounds against poisoned retrieved texts and reduces attack success rate to 1% while keeping 71% accuracy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.