REVIEW 2 cited by
LLMArena: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Dynamic Multi-Agent Environments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have revealed their potential for achieving autonomous agents possessing human-level intelligence. However, existing benchmarks for evaluating LLM Agents either use static datasets, potentially leading to data leakage or focus only on single-agent scenarios, overlooking the complexities of multi-agent interactions. There is a lack of a benchmark that evaluates the diverse capabilities of LLM agents in multi-agent, dynamic environments. To this end, we introduce LLMArena, a novel and easily extensible framework for evaluating the diverse capabilities of LLM in multi-agent dynamic environments. LLMArena encompasses seven distinct gaming environments, employing Trueskill scoring to assess crucial abilities in LLM agents, including spatial reasoning, strategic planning, numerical reasoning, risk assessment, communication, opponent modeling, and team collaboration. We conduct an extensive experiment and human evaluation among different sizes and types of LLMs, showing that LLMs still have a significant journey ahead in their development towards becoming fully autonomous agents, especially in opponent modeling and team collaboration. We hope LLMArena could guide future research towards enhancing these capabilities in LLMs, ultimately leading to more sophisticated and practical applications in dynamic, multi-agent settings. The code and data will be available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Research Community Perspectives on "Intelligence" and Large Language Models
A survey of 303 researchers finds that generalization, adaptability, and reasoning are the most agreed-upon criteria for intelligence, and that most researchers do not consider current LLM-based systems intelligent.
-
Toward Adaptable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: An Assumption-Aware Review
A survey proposing adaptability as a three-part taxonomy (learning, policy, scenario-driven) for organizing and evaluating MARL under changing conditions.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.