REVIEW 2 cited by
Beyond the Known: Investigating LLMs Performance on Out-of-Domain Intent Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Out-of-domain (OOD) intent detection aims to examine whether the user's query falls outside the predefined domain of the system, which is crucial for the proper functioning of task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems. Previous methods address it by fine-tuning discriminative models. Recently, some studies have been exploring the application of large language models (LLMs) represented by ChatGPT to various downstream tasks, but it is still unclear for their ability on OOD detection task.This paper conducts a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs under various experimental settings, and then outline the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs. We find that LLMs exhibit strong zero-shot and few-shot capabilities, but is still at a disadvantage compared to models fine-tuned with full resource. More deeply, through a series of additional analysis experiments, we discuss and summarize the challenges faced by LLMs and provide guidance for future work including injecting domain knowledge, strengthening knowledge transfer from IND(In-domain) to OOD, and understanding long instructions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Large Language Model Data Generation for Enhanced Intent Recognition in German Speech
LLM-generated German text data improves intent recognition for elderly German speakers, and the smaller German-focused LeoLM outperforms the much larger ChatGPT as a data generator.
-
Knowledge Graphs are all you need: Leveraging KGs in Physics Question Answering
Using LLM-generated knowledge graphs to guide question decomposition modestly improves GPT-4's success rate on 100 high-school physics questions, but the evidence is informal and the dataset is not released.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.