REVIEW 4 cited by
JMLR: Joint Medical LLM and Retrieval Training for Enhancing Reasoning and Professional Question Answering Capability
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a remarkable potential in medical knowledge acquisition and question-answering. However, LLMs can potentially hallucinate and yield factually incorrect outcomes, even with domain-specific pretraining. Previously, retrieval augmented generation (RAG) has limited success in addressing hallucinations. Unlike previous methods in RAG where the retrieval model was trained separately from the LLM, we introduce JMLR (for Jointly trains LLM and information Retrieval) during the fine-tuning phase. The synchronized training mechanism enhances JMLR's ability to retrieve clinical guidelines and leverage medical knowledge to reason and answer questions and reduces the demand for computational resources. We evaluated JMLR on the important medical question-answering application. Our experimental results demonstrate that JMLR-13B (70.5%) outperforms a previous state-of-the-art open-source model using conventional pre-training and fine-tuning Meditron-70B (68.9%) and Llama2-13B with RAG (67.7%) on a medical question-answering dataset. Comprehensive evaluations reveal JMLR-13B enhances reasoning quality and reduces hallucinations better than Claude3-Opus. Additionally, JMLR-13B (148 GPU hours) also trains much faster than Meditron-70B (42630 GPU hours). Through this work, we provide a new and efficient knowledge enhancement method for healthcare, demonstrating the potential of integrating retrieval and LLM training for medical question-answering systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Credit Cards, Confusion, Computation, and Consequences: What Can We Uncover About Language Model Reasoning?
CreditCardQA shows LLMs err mainly on credit-card contractual conditions and comparisons, not arithmetic, with Program-of-Thought narrowing open–closed model gaps.
-
Med-R$^3$: Enhancing Medical Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning of LLMs via Progressive Reinforcement Learning
A progressive three-stage RL framework with medical-specific rewards improves retrieval-augmented reasoning on medical QA benchmarks, reportedly surpassing GPT-4o-mini with an 8B model.
-
HIVMedQA: Benchmarking large language models for HIV medical decision support
The HIVMedQA benchmark finds that Gemini 2.5 Pro leads on most clinical reasoning dimensions, medical fine-tuning does not guarantee gains, and LLM judges are more informative than lexical overlap.
-
Conversation Forests: The Key to Fine Tuning Large Language Models for Multi-Turn Medical Conversations is Branching
Branched multi-turn conversation training outperformed linear training on simulated medical interviews for Llama-3.1-8B and Ministral-8B.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.