Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Precoding for Multi-Cell ISAC: from Coordinated Beamforming to Coordinated Multipoint and Bi-Static Sensing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18387 v1 pith:KYV45KM5 submitted 2024-02-28 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT
keywords sensingcoordinatedprecodingcommunicationcompisacmulti-cellbeamforming
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a framework for designing robust precoders for a multi-input single-output (MISO) system that performs integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) across multiple cells and users. We use Cramer-Rao-Bound (CRB) to measure the sensing performance and derive its expressions for two multi-cell scenarios, namely coordinated beamforming (CBF) and coordinated multi-point (CoMP). In the CBF scheme, a BS shares channel state information (CSI) and estimates target parameters using monostatic sensing. In contrast, a BS in the CoMP scheme shares the CSI and data, allowing bistatic sensing through inter-cell reflection. We consider both block-level (BL) and symbol-level (SL) precoding schemes for both the multi-cell scenarios that are robust to channel state estimation errors. The formulated optimization problems to minimize the CRB in estimating the parameters of a target and maximize the minimum communication signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio (SINR) while satisfying a given total transmit power budget are non-convex. We tackle the non-convexity using a combination of semidefinite relaxation (SDR) and alternating optimization (AO) techniques. Simulations suggest that neglecting the inter-cell reflection and communication links degrades the performance of an ISAC system. The CoMP scenario employing SL precoding performs the best, whereas the BL precoding applied in the CBF scenario produces relatively high estimation error for a given minimum SINR value.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Signaling Design for Noncoherent Distributed Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems

    eess.SP 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A CRB-minimizing signal design framework for noncoherent distributed ISAC that jointly optimizes per-subcarrier sensing waveforms and CoMP communication precoders.

  2. Federated Learning Strategies for Coordinated Beamforming in Multicell ISAC

    eess.SP 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two federated learning frameworks for multicell ISAC beamforming are proposed: a VFL approach with a central server and an HFL approach with a fully distributed leakage-penalty loss function.

Pith tools