Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Few-Shot Fairness: Unveiling LLM's Potential for Fairness-Aware Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18502 v1 pith:HAGUQC3X submitted 2024-02-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords fairnessllmsin-contextclassificationlearningmodelsvariousabstraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Employing Large Language Models (LLM) in various downstream applications such as classification is crucial, especially for smaller companies lacking the expertise and resources required for fine-tuning a model. Fairness in LLMs helps ensure inclusivity, equal representation based on factors such as race, gender and promotes responsible AI deployment. As the use of LLMs has become increasingly prevalent, it is essential to assess whether LLMs can generate fair outcomes when subjected to considerations of fairness. In this study, we introduce a framework outlining fairness regulations aligned with various fairness definitions, with each definition being modulated by varying degrees of abstraction. We explore the configuration for in-context learning and the procedure for selecting in-context demonstrations using RAG, while incorporating fairness rules into the process. Experiments conducted with different LLMs indicate that GPT-4 delivers superior results in terms of both accuracy and fairness compared to other models. This work is one of the early attempts to achieve fairness in prediction tasks by utilizing LLMs through in-context learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can ChatGPT Diagnose Alzheimer's Disease?

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    On 9,300 ADNI records, multi-shot prompting with combined MRI and cognitive features let ChatGPT reach 94.6% accuracy, but missing baselines and possible data leakage limit the claim.

Pith tools