Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Model Predictive Control with adaptive resilience for Denial-of-Service Attacks mitigation on a Regulated Dam

Systems and Control · Submitted 28 Feb 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We demonstrate the resulting MPC strategy's effectiveness in 2 attack scenarios on a real system with actual data, the regulated Olginate dam of Lake Como.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2402.18516 (version 1)
Pith IDFLQKDQIU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationRaffaele Giuseppe Cestari, Simone Formentin, Stefano Longari, Stefano Zanero. "Model Predictive Control with adaptive resilience for Denial-of-Service Attacks mitigation on a Regulated Dam." arXiv:2402.18516 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/FLQKDQIU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,006 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.17 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In recent years, SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems have increasingly become the target of cyber attacks. SCADAs are no longer isolated, as web-based applications expose strategic infrastructures to the outside world connection. In a cyber-warfare context, we propose a Model Predictive Control (MPC) architecture with adaptive resilience, capable of guaranteeing control performance in normal operating conditions and driving towards resilience against DoS (controller-actuator) attacks when needed. Since the attackers' goal is typically to maximize the system damage, we assume they solve an adversarial optimal control problem. An adaptive resilience factor is then designed as a function of the intensity function of a Hawkes process, a point process model estimating the occurrence of random events in time, trained on a moving window to estimate the return time of the next attack. We demonstrate the resulting MPC strategy's effectiveness in 2 attack scenarios on a real system with actual data, the regulated Olginate dam of Lake Como.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In recent years, SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems have increasingly become the target of cyber attacks. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 SCADAs are no longer isolated, as web-based applications expose strategic infrastructures to the outside world connection. background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 In a cyber-warfare context, we propose a Model Predictive Control (MPC) architecture with adaptive resilience, capable of guaranteeing control performance in normal operating conditions and driving towards resilience against DoS (controller-actuator) attacks when needed. contribution 0.98 0.85 0.54 asserted 0.80
s3 Since the attackers' goal is typically to maximize the system damage, we assume they solve an adversarial optimal control problem. method 0.79 0.15 0.04 hedged possibility 0.50
s4 An adaptive resilience factor is then designed as a function of the intensity function of a Hawkes process, a point process model estimating the occurrence of random events in time, trained on a moving window to estimate the return time of the next attack. method 0.97 0.89 0.06 asserted 1.00
s5 We demonstrate the resulting MPC strategy's effectiveness in 2 attack scenarios on a real system with actual data, the regulated Olginate dam of Lake Como. result 0.63 0.96 0.54 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.58.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In recent years, SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems have increasingly become the target of cyber attacks. SCADAs are no longer isolated, as web-based applications expose strategic infrastructures to the outside world connection. In a cyber-warfare context, we propose a Model Predictive Control (MPC) architecture with adaptive resilience, capable of guaranteeing control performance in normal operating conditions and driving towards resilience against DoS (controller-actuator) attacks when needed. Since the attackers' goal is typically to maximize the system damage, we assume they solve an adversarial optimal control problem. An adaptive resilience factor is then designed as a function of the intensity function of a Hawkes process, a point process model estimating the occurrence of random events in time, trained on a moving window to estimate the return time of the next attack. We demonstrate the resulting MPC strategy's effectiveness in 2 attack scenarios on a real system with actual data, the regulated Olginate dam of Lake Como.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • This is possible thanks to Hawkes processes ( [ref] ), a class of point processes that allows us to estimate the return time of an event whose occurrence is apparently random in time.

    Hawkes Processes · INTRODUCTION · 0.92

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.