Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Smart abstraction based on iterative cover and non-uniform cells

Dynamical Systems · Submitted 4 Mar 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Finally, we provide a tractable implementation of this algorithm for the optimal control of L-smooth nonlinear dynamical systems.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2403.02190 (version 2)
Pith IDR2RXHVS5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJulien Calbert, Lucas N. Egidio, Rapha\"el M. Jungers. "Smart abstraction based on iterative cover and non-uniform cells." arXiv:2403.02190 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/R2RXHVS5
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,553 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.58 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We propose a multi-scale approach for computing abstractions of dynamical systems, that incorporates both local and global optimal control to construct a goal-specific abstraction. For a local optimal control problem, we not only design the controller ensuring the transition between every two subsets (cells) of the state space but also incorporate the volume and shape of these cells into the optimization process. This integrated approach enables the design of non-uniform cells, effectively reducing the complexity of the abstraction. These local optimal controllers are then combined into a digraph, which is globally optimized to obtain the entire trajectory. The global optimizer attempts to lazily build the abstraction along the optimal trajectory, which is less affected by an increase in the number of dimensions. Since the optimal trajectory is generally unknown in practice, we propose a methodology based on the RRT* algorithm to determine it incrementally. Finally, we provide a tractable implementation of this algorithm for the optimal control of L-smooth nonlinear dynamical systems.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We propose a multi-scale approach for computing abstractions of dynamical systems, that incorporates both local and global optimal control to construct a goal-specific abstraction. contribution 0.99 0.88 0.27 asserted 0.99
s1 For a local optimal control problem, we not only design the controller ensuring the transition between every two subsets (cells) of the state space but also incorporate the volume and shape of these cells into the optimization process. method 0.85 0.92 0.07 asserted 1.00
s2 This integrated approach enables the design of non-uniform cells, effectively reducing the complexity of the abstraction. interpretation 0.50 0.81 0.21 asserted 0.98
s3 These local optimal controllers are then combined into a digraph, which is globally optimized to obtain the entire trajectory. method 0.99 0.83 0.09 asserted 1.00
s4 The global optimizer attempts to lazily build the abstraction along the optimal trajectory, which is less affected by an increase in the number of dimensions. interpretation 0.36 0.59 0.13 asserted 0.88
s5 Since the optimal trajectory is generally unknown in practice, we propose a methodology based on the RRT* algorithm to determine it incrementally. method 0.75 0.87 0.06 asserted 0.99
s6 Finally, we provide a tractable implementation of this algorithm for the optimal control of L-smooth nonlinear dynamical systems. contribution 0.88 0.92 0.15 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.54.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We propose a multi-scale approach for computing abstractions of dynamical systems, that incorporates both local and global optimal control to construct a goal-specific abstraction. For a local optimal control problem, we not only design the controller ensuring the transition between every two subsets (cells) of the state space but also incorporate the volume and shape of these cells into the optimization process. This integrated approach enables the design of non-uniform cells, effectively reducing the complexity of the abstraction. These local optimal controllers are then combined into a digraph, which is globally optimized to obtain the entire trajectory. The global optimizer attempts to lazily build the abstraction along the optimal trajectory, which is less affected by an increase in the number of dimensions. Since the optimal trajectory is generally unknown in practice, we propose a methodology based on the RRT* algorithm to determine it incrementally. Finally, we provide a tractable implementation of this algorithm for the optimal control of L-smooth nonlinear dynamical systems.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Compares with 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.