pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.07139 · v3 · pith:277NMS6Nnew · submitted 2024-03-11 · ✦ hep-th · math.AG· math.SG

Chern Characteristics and Todd-Hirzebruch Identities for Transpolar Pairs of Toric Spaces

Per Berglund , Tristan H\"ubsch This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 02:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math.AGmath.SG
keywords spacesstandardtorictranspolarassociatedcalabi-yaucertainchern
0
0 comments X

The pith

VEX multitopes correspond to smooth toric spaces whose Chern classes satisfy the Todd-Hirzebruch identities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends standard toric methods for Calabi-Yau varieties to complete intersections in non-Fano varieties by using star triangulations of non-convex polytopes. It conjectures that mirror symmetry continues to hold through a transpolar duality that generalizes the Batyrev-Borisov construction to include VEX multitopes, which are self-overlaying, flip-folded multihedral objects. These objects map to non-algebraic but smooth toric spaces, and explicit computations of diffeomorphism invariants, such as characteristic submanifold intersection numbers, show they belong to the same connected web as ordinary constructions. A sympathetic reader cares because the result enlarges the set of spaces that can appear in string compactifications inside deformation families of generalized complete intersections in products of projective spaces.

Core claim

Transpolar pairs of toric spaces associated with VEX multitopes have Chern classes obeying the standard Todd-Hirzebruch identities, and the computed invariants confirm that these spaces arise together with standard Fano and reflexive polytope constructions inside deformation families of generalized complete intersections.

What carries the argument

Transpolar duality, the generalization of the Batyrev-Borisov mirror map to non-convex polytopes and VEX multitopes.

If this is right

  • Diffeomorphism invariants of the VEX-associated toric spaces match those expected from the standard constructions.
  • VEX multitopes sit inside the same deformation families of generalized complete intersections in products of projective spaces.
  • Mirror pairs exist for the extended class of objects under the generalized transpolar duality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • String compactifications could now access geometries outside the convex polytope regime.
  • The link to pre-symplectic geometry may supply new ways to compute or constrain the invariants.
  • Further explicit examples would test whether every VEX multito pe satisfies the identities.
  • keywords

Load-bearing premise

Mirror symmetry is assumed to hold via transpolar duality for non-convex polytopes and VEX multitopes.

What would settle it

A direct calculation for a concrete VEX multito pe example in which the Todd-Hirzebruch identity for the Chern classes fails, or the characteristic intersection numbers fall outside the deformation family.

read the original abstract

Standard toric geometry methods used to construct Calabi-Yau varieties may be extended to complete intersections in non-Fano varieties encoded by star triangulating non-convex polytopes. Similarly, mirror symmetry is conjectured to hold in terms of a transpolar duality generalizing the original construction of Batyrev and Borisov. The associated mirror pairs naturally include certain flip-folded, multi-layered multihedral objects, inclusively named VEX multitopes, and a correspondingly generalized transpolar duality. These self-overlaying VEX multitopes, long since known in pre-symplectic geometry, are found to correspond to certain non-algebraic but smooth toric spaces with Chern classes that satisfy the standard Todd-Hirzebruch identities. The computation of diffeomorphism invariants, including characteristic submanifold intersection numbers, corroborates their recent inclusion in the connected web of Calabi-Yau spaces and associated string compactifications: They arise together with the standard (Fano/reflexive polytope) constructions, within deformation families of generalized complete intersections in products of projective spaces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper extends toric geometry constructions of Calabi-Yau complete intersections to non-Fano varieties via star triangulations of non-convex polytopes. It conjectures a transpolar duality that generalizes the Batyrev-Borisov mirror symmetry construction to include flip-folded VEX multitopes, and reports computations of Chern classes, Todd-Hirzebruch identities, and diffeomorphism invariants (including characteristic submanifold intersection numbers) for the associated smooth non-algebraic toric spaces. These computations are presented as corroborating the inclusion of VEX multitopes within deformation families of generalized complete intersections in products of projective spaces.

Significance. If the transpolar duality conjecture holds and the computed invariants correctly place the spaces in the claimed Calabi-Yau web, the work would enlarge the class of toric constructions relevant to string compactifications by incorporating non-algebraic smooth toric spaces. The explicit verification of Todd-Hirzebruch identities for these spaces is a concrete consistency check independent of the duality, though the manuscript provides no machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the statement that 'the computation of diffeomorphism invariants... corroborates their recent inclusion in the connected web of Calabi-Yau spaces' is not supported by any explicit check that the spaces arise in the claimed deformation families of generalized complete intersections or that Hodge numbers exchange under the conjectured duality; the Todd-Hirzebruch verifications are independent of mirror symmetry and do not test membership in those families.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central link between VEX multitopes and Calabi-Yau deformation families rests on the unproven conjecture that 'mirror symmetry is conjectured to hold in terms of a transpolar duality generalizing the original construction of Batyrev and Borisov'; no derivation, explicit construction, or falsifiable test of this generalization is provided, rendering the inclusion claim conjectural rather than corroborated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The definition and geometric properties of 'VEX multitopes' are referenced to pre-symplectic geometry but lack a self-contained description or figure in the abstract, which would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on the abstract. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to clarify the scope of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the statement that 'the computation of diffeomorphism invariants... corroborates their recent inclusion in the connected web of Calabi-Yau spaces' is not supported by any explicit check that the spaces arise in the claimed deformation families of generalized complete intersections or that Hodge numbers exchange under the conjectured duality; the Todd-Hirzebruch verifications are independent of mirror symmetry and do not test membership in those families.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract phrasing implies a stronger form of corroboration than is explicitly demonstrated. The diffeomorphism invariants (including characteristic submanifold intersection numbers) are shown to match those of the relevant generalized complete intersections, providing topological consistency, but no explicit deformation family or Hodge-number exchange under the duality is constructed. The Todd-Hirzebruch identities are indeed independent checks on the Chern classes. We will revise the abstract to state that the invariants supply supporting evidence consistent with the conjectural inclusion rather than direct verification of membership in the deformation families. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central link between VEX multitopes and Calabi-Yau deformation families rests on the unproven conjecture that 'mirror symmetry is conjectured to hold in terms of a transpolar duality generalizing the original construction of Batyrev and Borisov'; no derivation, explicit construction, or falsifiable test of this generalization is provided, rendering the inclusion claim conjectural rather than corroborated.

    Authors: The manuscript presents the transpolar duality as a conjecture that generalizes the Batyrev-Borisov construction to include flip-folded VEX multitopes; no derivation or explicit construction beyond the conjecture is claimed. The Chern-class computations and Todd-Hirzebruch identities are offered as independent consistency checks on the resulting smooth toric spaces. We will revise the abstract to emphasize the conjectural nature of both the duality and the inclusion in the Calabi-Yau web, framing the invariant computations as corroborative evidence rather than a completed verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: computations of Chern classes and Todd-Hirzebruch identities are independent verifications

full rationale

The paper defines VEX multitopes via a conjectured transpolar duality generalizing Batyrev-Borisov and computes diffeomorphism invariants including characteristic submanifold intersection numbers and Chern class identities for the associated smooth toric spaces. These calculations are presented as direct verifications of standard identities on explicitly constructed spaces and do not reduce by definition or fitting to the duality conjecture itself. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that force the central result are identifiable from the abstract or description. The corroboration claim for inclusion in Calabi-Yau deformation families rests on the separate conjecture rather than tautological reuse of inputs, leaving the derivation chain self-contained against external toric geometry benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review is based solely on the abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed beyond the introduction of VEX multitopes as a generalization.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard properties of toric varieties and Chern classes hold for the generalized constructions.
    Invoked implicitly when stating that Chern classes satisfy Todd-Hirzebruch identities for the new spaces.
invented entities (1)
  • VEX multitopes no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode flip-folded, multi-layered multihedral objects arising in transpolar duality for non-convex polytopes.
    Introduced in the abstract as inclusively named objects corresponding to non-algebraic smooth toric spaces.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1448 out tokens · 24527 ms · 2026-05-24T02:49:12.058582+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Algebraic Superstring Compactification: Part II

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Deformations in algebraic superstring models indicate a non-algebraic generalization that aligns with mirror duality requirements.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Vacuum configurations for superstrings,

    P. Candelas, G.T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten, “Vacuum configurations for superstrings,”Nucl. Phys. B258 (1985) 46–74

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Strings on orbifolds,

    L.J. Dixon, J.A. Harvey , C. Vafa, and E. Witten, “Strings on orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B261 (1985) 678–686

    work page 1985

  3. [3]

    The moduli space of 3-folds with K = 0 may nevertheless be irreducible,

    M.A. Reid, “The moduli space of 3-folds with K = 0 may nevertheless be irreducible,”Math. Ann. 278 no. 1-4, (1987) 329–334

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    Complete intersection Calabi–Yau manifolds,

    P. Candelas, A.M. Dale, C.A. Lutken, and R. Schimmrigk, “Complete intersection Calabi–Yau manifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B298 (1988) 493

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    Connecting moduli spaces of Calabi–Yau threefolds,

    P.S. Green and T. H ¨ubsch, “Connecting moduli spaces of Calabi–Yau threefolds,”Comm. Math. Phys. 119 (1988) 431–441

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    Possible phase transitions among Calabi–Yau compactifications,

    P.S. Green and T. H ¨ubsch, “Possible phase transitions among Calabi–Yau compactifications,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1163–1166

    work page 1988

  7. [7]

    Finite distances between distinct Calabi–Yau manifolds,

    P. Candelas, P.S. Green, and T. H ¨ubsch, “Finite distances between distinct Calabi–Yau manifolds,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 1956–1959

    work page 1989

  8. [8]

    Rolling among Calabi–Yau vacua,

    P. Candelas, P.S. Green, and T. H ¨ubsch, “Rolling among Calabi–Yau vacua,”Nucl. Phys. B330 (1990) 49–102. 44

    work page 1990

  9. [9]

    H ¨ubsch, Calabi–Yau Manifolds: a Bestiary for Physicists

    T. H ¨ubsch, Calabi–Yau Manifolds: a Bestiary for Physicists. World Scientific Publishing Co., River Edge, NJ, 1992

    work page 1992

  10. [10]

    How singular a space can superstrings thread?

    T. H ¨ubsch, “How singular a space can superstrings thread?”Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 207–216

    work page 1991

  11. [11]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa, “Cobordism classes and the swampland,” arXiv:1909.10355 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1909

  12. [12]

    Phases of $N=2$ Theories In Two Dimensions

    E. Witten, “Phases of N = 2 theories in two-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B403 (1993) 159–222, hep-th/9301042

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  13. [13]

    Summing the Instantons: Quantum Cohomology and Mirror Symmetry in Toric Varieties

    D.R. Morrison and M.R. Plesser, “Summing the instantons: Quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry in toric varieties,” Nucl. Phys. B440 (1995) 279–354, arXiv:hep-th/9412236 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  14. [14]

    (0,2) Landau-Ginzburg Theory

    J. Distler and S. Kachru, “ (0, 2) Landau–Ginzburg theory ,”Nucl. Phys. B 413 (1994) 213–243, arXiv:hep-th/9309110

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  15. [15]

    F-theory and 2d (0,2) Theories

    S. Sch ¨afer-Nameki and T. Weigand, “F-theory and 2d(0, 2) theories,”JHEP 05 (2016) 059, arXiv:1601.02015 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Metastring Theory and Modular Space-time

    L. Freidel, R.G. Leigh, and D. Minic, “Metastring theory and modular space-time,” JHEP 06 (2015) 006, arXiv:1502.08005 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Mirror symmetry , Born geometry and string theory ,

    P. Berglund, T. H ¨ubsch, and D. Minic, “Mirror symmetry , Born geometry and string theory ,” inNankai Symposium on Mathematical Dialogues: Celebrating the 110th Anniversary of the Birth of Prof. S.-S. Chern, Y.-H. He, M.-L. Ge, C.-M. Bai, J. Bao, and E. Hirst, eds. Springer Verlag, Singapore, Sept., 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Kempf, F

    G. Kempf, F. Knudsen, D. Mumford, and B. Saint-Donat, Toroidal Embeddings 1. No. 339 in Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, 1973

    work page 1973

  19. [19]

    The geometry of toric varieties,

    V.I. Danilov, “The geometry of toric varieties,”Russian Math. Surveys 33 no. 2, (1978) 97–154

    work page 1978

  20. [20]

    Oda, Convex Bodies and Algebraic Geometry: An Introduction to the Theory of Toric Varieties

    T. Oda, Convex Bodies and Algebraic Geometry: An Introduction to the Theory of Toric Varieties. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics. Springer, 1988

    work page 1988

  21. [21]

    Fulton, Introduction to Toric Varieties

    W. Fulton, Introduction to Toric Varieties. Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, 1993

    work page 1993

  22. [22]

    Ewald, Combinatorial Convexity and Algebraic Geometry

    G. Ewald, Combinatorial Convexity and Algebraic Geometry. Springer Verlag, 1996

    work page 1996

  23. [23]

    Cox, J.B

    D.A. Cox, J.B. Little, and H.K. Schenck, Toric Varieties, vol. 124 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society , 2011

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, “Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 no. 6, (2000) 1209–1230, arXiv:hep-th/0002240

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  25. [25]

    Duality in Calabi–Yau moduli space,

    B.R. Greene and M.R. Plesser, “Duality in Calabi–Yau moduli space,”Nucl. Phys. B338 (1990) 15–37

    work page 1990

  26. [26]

    A Generalized Construction of Mirror Manifolds

    P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “A generalized construction of mirror manifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B393 no. 1-2, (1993) 377–391, arXiv:hep-th/9201014 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  27. [27]

    Dual Polyhedra and Mirror Symmetry for Calabi-Yau Hypersurfaces in Toric Varieties

    V.V. Batyrev, “Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties,”J. Alg. Geom. 3 no. 3, (1994) 493–535, arXiv:alg-geom/9310003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  28. [28]

    On Calabi–Yau complete intersections in toric varieties,

    V.V. Batyrev and L.A. Borisov, “On Calabi–Yau complete intersections in toric varieties,” inHigher-dimensional complex varieties (Trento, 1994), pp. 39–65. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996

    work page 1994

  29. [29]

    Landau-Ginzburg Orbifolds, Mirror Symmetry and the Elliptic Genus

    P. Berglund and M. Henningson, “Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds, mirror symmetry and the elliptic genus,” Nucl. Phys. B433 (1995) 311–332, arXiv:hep-th/9401029 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  30. [30]

    Mirror Symmetry for Calabi-Yau Hypersurfaces in Weighted P_4 and Extensions of Landau Ginzburg Theory

    P. Candelas, X. de la Ossa, and S.H. Katz, “Mirror symmetry for Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in weighted P4 and extensions of Landau–Ginzburg theory ,”Nucl. Phys. B450 (1995) 267–292, arXiv:hep-th/9412117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  31. [31]

    Exponential sums on A^n, II

    V.V. Batyrev and L.A. Borisov, “Mirror duality and string-theoretic Hodge numbers,”Invent. Math. 126 no. 1, (1996) 183–203, arXiv:math/9909009 [math.AG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  32. [32]

    Dual cones and mirror symmetry for generalized Calabi–Yau manifolds,

    V.V. Batyrev and L.A. Borisov, “Dual cones and mirror symmetry for generalized Calabi–Yau manifolds,” inMirror symmetry, II, vol. 1 of AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math., pp. 71–86. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997

    work page 1997

  33. [33]

    FJRW-rings and Mirror Symmetry

    M. Krawitz, N. Priddis, P. Acosta, N. Bergin, and H. Rathnakumara, “FJRW-rings and mirror symmetry ,”Communications in Mathematical Physics 296 no. 1, (Oct., 2009) 145–174, arXiv:0903.3220 [math-AG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    FJRW rings and Landau-Ginzburg Mirror Symmetry

    M. Krawitz, FJRW rings and Landau–Ginzburg Mirror Symmetry. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2010. arXiv:0906.0796 [math.AG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  35. [35]

    Berglund-H\"ubsch mirror symmetry via vertex algebras

    L.A. Borisov, “Berglund–H¨ubsch mirror symmetry via vertex algebras,”Comm. Math. Phys. 320 no. 1, (2013) 73–99, arXiv:1007.2633 [math.AG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [36]

    Families of Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in $\mathbb Q$-Fano toric varieties

    M. Artebani, P. Comparin, and R. Guilbot, “Families of Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in Q-Fano toric varieties,”J. Math. Pure & Appl. 106 no. 2, (2016) 319–341, arXiv:1501.05681 [math.AG] . 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Derived Categories of BHK Mirrors

    D. Favero and T.L. Kelly , “Derived categories of BHK mirrors,”Adv. Math. 352 (2019) 943–980, arXiv:1602.05876 [math.AG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    A Generalized Construction of Calabi-Yau Models and Mirror Symmetry

    P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “A generalized construction of Calabi–Yau models and mirror symmetry ,”SciPost 4 no. 2, (2018) 009 (1–30), arXiv:1611.10300 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Berglund and T

    P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “Hirzebruch surfaces, Tyurin degenerations and toric mirrors: Bridging generalized Calabi–Yau constructions,”Adv. in Th. Math. Phys. 26 no. 8, (2022) 2541–2598, arXiv:2205.12827 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    A New Construction of Calabi-Yau Manifolds: Generalized CICYs

    L.B. Anderson, F. Apruzzi, X. Gao, J. Gray , and S.-J. Lee, “A new construction of Calabi–Yau manifolds: Generalized CICYs,”Nucl. Phys. B906 (2016) 441–496, arXiv:1507.03235 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    On Calabi–Yau generalized complete intersections from Hirzebruch varieties and novel K3-fibrations,

    P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “On Calabi–Yau generalized complete intersections from Hirzebruch varieties and novel K3-fibrations,”ATMP 22 no. 2, (2018) 261 – 303, arXiv:1606.07420 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    A remark on generalized complete intersections

    A. Garbagnati and B. van Geemen, “A remark on generalized complete intersections,” Nucl. Phys. B925 (2017) 135–143, arXiv:1708.00517 [math.AG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    On the Connectedness of the Moduli Space of Calabi--Yau Manifolds

    A.C. Avram, P. Candelas, D. Jancic, and M. Mandelberg, “On the connectedness of moduli spaces of Calabi–Yau manifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B465 (1996) 458–472, arXiv:hep-th/9511230 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  44. [44]

    The web of Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties

    A.C. Avram, M. Kreuzer, M. Mandelberg, and H. Skarke, “The Web of Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties,”Nucl. Phys. B505 (1997) 625–640, arXiv:hep-th/9703003 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  45. [45]

    Unitary toric manifolds, multi-fans and equivariant index,

    M. Masuda, “Unitary toric manifolds, multi-fans and equivariant index,” Tohoku Math. J. (2) 51 no. 2, (1999) 237–265

    work page 1999

  46. [46]

    From convex polytopes to multi-polytopes,

    M. Masuda, “From convex polytopes to multi-polytopes,” Notes Res. Inst. Math. Analysis 1175 (2000) 1–15

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    Theory of multi-fans

    A. Hattori and M. Masuda, “Theory of multi-fans,” Osaka J. Math. 40 (2003) 1–68, arXiv:math/0106229 [math.SG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  48. [48]

    On the cohomology of torus manifolds

    M. Masuda and T. Panov, “On the cohomology of torus manifolds,”Osaka Journal of Mathematics 43 no. 3, (2006) 711 – 746, arXiv:math/0306100 [math.AT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    Elliptic genera, torus manifolds and multi-fans

    A. Hattori and M. Masuda, “Elliptic genera, torus manifolds and multi-fans,” Int. J. of Math. 16 no. 9, (July , 2006) 957–998, arXiv:math/0107014 [math.SG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    Elliptic genera, torus orbifolds and multi-fans; II

    A. Hattori, “Elliptic genera, torus orbifolds and multi-fans; II,” Int. J. Math 17 no. 06, (2006) 707–735, arXiv:math/0501392 [math.AT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Multipolytopes and convex chains,

    Y. Nishimura, “Multipolytopes and convex chains,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 252 (2006) 212–224

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Invariant stably complex structures on topological toric manifolds,

    H. Ishida, “Invariant stably complex structures on topological toric manifolds,” Osaka J. Math. 50 (2013) 795–806

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Convex polytopes, Coxeter orbifolds and torus actions,

    M.W. Davis and T. Januszkiewicz, “Convex polytopes, Coxeter orbifolds and torus actions,” Duke Math. J. 62 no. 2, (1991) 417–451

    work page 1991

  54. [54]

    Topological toric manifolds

    H. Ishida, Y. Fukukawa, and M. Masuda, “Topological toric manifolds,”Moscow Math. J. 13 no. 1, (2013) 57–98, arXiv:1012.1786 [math.AT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  55. [55]

    Buchstaber and T

    V. Buchstaber and T. Panov, Toric Topology. No. 204 in Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society , Providence, RI, 2015

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Four dimensional almost complex torus manifolds,

    D. Jang, “Four dimensional almost complex torus manifolds,” arXiv:2310.11024 [math.DG]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Lattice polygons and the number 12,

    B. Poonen and F. Rodriguez–Villegas, “Lattice polygons and the number 12,”Am. Math. Monthly 107 no. 3, (March,

    work page

  58. [58]

    Lattice multi-polygons

    A. Higashitani and M. Masuda, “Lattice multipolygons,” Kyoto Journal of Mathematics 57 no. 4, (Dec, 2017) 807–828, arXiv:1204.0088 [math.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    A Riemann–Roch theorem for integrals and sums of quasipolynomials over virtual polytopes,

    A. Khovanskii and A. Pukhlikov, “A Riemann–Roch theorem for integrals and sums of quasipolynomials over virtual polytopes,”St. Petersburg Math. J. 4 no. 4, (1993) 789–812

    work page 1993

  60. [60]

    The moment map and line bundles over presymplectic toric manifolds,

    Y. Karshon and S. Tolman, “The moment map and line bundles over presymplectic toric manifolds,”J. Diff. Geom. 38 no. 3, (1993) 465–484

    work page 1993

  61. [61]

    Symplectic Origami

    A.C. da Silva, V. Guillemin, and A.R. Pires, “Symplectic origami,” Int. Math. Res. Not. 2011 no. 18, (Dec, 2010) 4252–4293, arXiv:0909.4065 [math.SG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  62. [62]

    Toric origami manifolds and multi-fans

    M. Masuda and S. Park, “Toric origami manifolds and multi-fans,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 286 (May , 2014) 308–323, arXiv:1305.6347 [math.SG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    12, 24 and Beyond

    L. Godinho, F. von Heymann, and S. Sabatini, “12, 24 and beyond,” Adv. Math 319 (2017) 472–521, arXiv:1604.00277 [math.CO]. 46

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    Calabi-Yau Moduli Space, Mirror Manifolds and Spacetime Topology Change in String Theory

    P.S. Aspinwall, B.R. Greene, and D.R. Morrison, “Calabi–Yau moduli space, mirror manifolds and space-time topology change in string theory ,”Nucl. Phys. B416 (1994) 414–480, arXiv:hep-th/9309097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  65. [65]

    On the Geometry and Homology of Certain Simple Stratified Varieties

    T. H ¨ubsch and A. Rahman, “On the geometry and homology of certain simple stratified varieties,”J. Geom. Phys. 53 (2005) 31–48, arXiv:math/0210394

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    A perverse sheaf approach toward a cohomology theory for string theory ,

    A. Rahman, “A perverse sheaf approach toward a cohomology theory for string theory ,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 no. 3, (2009) 667–693, arXiv:0704.3298

    work page arXiv 2009

  67. [67]

    Banagl, Intersection Spaces, Spatial Homology Truncation, and String Theory

    M. Banagl, Intersection Spaces, Spatial Homology Truncation, and String Theory. No. 1997 in Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, 2010

    work page 1997

  68. [68]

    Homological Algebra of Mirror Symmetry

    M. Kontsevich, “Homological algebra of mirror symmetry ,” inProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, S.D. Chatterji, ed., pp. 120–139. Birkh¨auser Basel, Basel, 1995. arXiv:alg-geom/9411018 [alg-geom]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  69. [69]

    Cox and S

    D.A. Cox and S. Katz, Mirror Symmetry and Algebraic Geometry, vol. 68 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society , Providence, RI, 1999

    work page 1999

  70. [70]

    Mirror Symmetry is T-Duality

    A. Strominger, S.-T. Yau, and E. Zaslow, “Mirror symmetry is T-duality ,”Nucl. Phys. B479 (1996) 243–259, arXiv:hep-th/9606040

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  71. [71]

    Tropical Periods for Calabi–Yau Hypersurfaces in non-Fano Toric Varieties,

    P. Berglund and M. Lathwood, “Tropical Periods for Calabi–Yau Hypersurfaces in non-Fano Toric Varieties,” arXiv:2212.11906 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    On the volume of lattice polyhedra,

    J.E. Reeve, “On the volume of lattice polyhedra,” Proc. London Math. Soc. s3-7 no. 2, (1957) 378–395

    work page 1957

  73. [73]

    Counting parallel segments: New variants of Pick’s area theorem,

    A. Belyaev and P.-A. Fayolle, “Counting parallel segments: New variants of Pick’s area theorem,”The Mathematical Intelligencer 41 no. 4, (2019) 1–7

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    Tangential Structures on Toric Manifolds, and Connected Sums of Polytopes

    V. Buchstaber and N. Ray , “Tangential structures on toric manifolds and connected sums of polytopes,”Internat. Math. Res. Notices 4 (2001) 193–219, arXiv:math/0010025 [math.AT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  75. [75]

    Lifting of morphisms to quotient presentations

    F. Berchtold, “Lifting of morphisms to quotient presentations,” Man. Math. 110 (2003) 33–44, arXiv:math/0209406 [math.AG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  76. [76]

    Volume polynomials and duality algebras of multi-fans,

    A. Ayzenberg and M. Masuda, “Volume polynomials and duality algebras of multi-fans,” Arnold Math. J. 2 no. 3, (Sept.,

    work page

  77. [77]

    329–381, arXiv:1509.03008 [math.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    Gromov–Hausdorff continuity of non-K¨ahler Calabi–Yau conifold transitions,

    B. Friedman, S. Picard, and C. Suan, “Gromov–Hausdorff continuity of non-K¨ahler Calabi–Yau conifold transitions,” arXiv:2404.11840 [math.DG]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Mirror manifolds: A Brief review and progress report,

    B.R. Greene and M.R. Plesser, “Mirror manifolds: A Brief review and progress report,” in 2nd International Symposium on Particles, Strings and Cosmology. 9, 1991

    work page 1991

  80. [80]

    ¨Uber eine Klasse von einfach-zusammenh¨angenden komplexen Mannigfaltigkeiten,

    F. Hirzebruch, “ ¨Uber eine Klasse von einfach-zusammenh¨angenden komplexen Mannigfaltigkeiten,”Math. Ann. 124 (1951) 77–86

    work page 1951

Showing first 80 references.