Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Navigating the Quantum Divide(s)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.08033 v2 pith:AEGQLCIR submitted 2024-03-12 physics.soc-ph physics.hist-phquant-ph

classification physics.soc-phphysics.hist-phquant-ph
keywords dividequantumcountriesdividessciencesocietaltechnologiesadoption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This article explores the potential divides from emerging quantum technologies (QT) on society, covering impacts on science, technology, geopolitics, and societal structures. We aim to challenge the concept of a single "quantum divide" by offering a comprehensive view. We propose four divides: in science, technologies, between countries, and within societies. The "Quantum Divide in Science" highlights gaps among scientists and access inequalities in research communities. The second divide, "Quantum Divide in Technologies through Path-dependency," looks at technology adoption processes. The "Quantum Divide between Countries" examines adoption reasons and outcomes across countries with varying development levels. Lastly, the "Quantum Divide within Societies" addresses societal implications, one of the most discussed in literature. We propose directions to navigate these divides, noting their interconnectedness and impact on innovation ecosystems. This study guides those interested in the quantum divide, navigation strategies, and QT's influence on scientific, technological, international, and societal institutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Goldilocks zone of governing technology: Leveraging uncertainty for responsible quantum practices

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes replacing fixed risk categories with a probabilistic, dynamically updated governance model inspired by quantum mechanics, illustrated by a notional Quantum Risk Simulator.

Pith tools