Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Review of Generative AI Methods in Cybersecurity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.08701 v2 pith:W3TGGESQ submitted 2024-03-13 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords genaicybersecuritydefensiveapplicationsattackbecomecreatingcurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the last decade, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly popular, especially with the use of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and DALL-E. With this rise, large language models (LLMs) and Generative AI (GenAI) have also become more prevalent in everyday use. These advancements strengthen cybersecurity's defensive posture and open up new attack avenues for adversaries as well. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art deployments of GenAI, covering assaults, jailbreaking, and applications of prompt injection and reverse psychology. This paper also provides the various applications of GenAI in cybercrimes, such as automated hacking, phishing emails, social engineering, reverse cryptography, creating attack payloads, and creating malware. GenAI can significantly improve the automation of defensive cyber security processes through strategies such as dataset construction, safe code development, threat intelligence, defensive measures, reporting, and cyberattack detection. In this study, we suggest that future research should focus on developing robust ethical norms and innovative defense mechanisms to address the current issues that GenAI creates and to also further encourage an impartial approach to its future application in cybersecurity. Moreover, we underscore the importance of interdisciplinary approaches further to bridge the gap between scientific developments and ethical considerations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 74 OSINT/CTI AI studies, hallucination is widely named but end-to-end measured in only one non-reproducible system, so a human–AI co-pilot is the most defensible near-term architecture.

  2. Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: Applications, Vulnerabilities, and Defense Techniques

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that maps LLM applications, vulnerabilities, and defenses across eight cybersecurity domains, but with significant citation and rigor problems.

  3. On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A critical review arguing that LLMs are surprisingly effective for penetration testing because the task is largely pattern-matching, while noting serious reliability, safety, and cost barriers to autonomous use.

Pith tools