Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Ensemble learning for uncertainty estimation with application to the correction of satellite precipitation products

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.10567 v3 pith:FQUXL565 submitted 2024-03-14 cs.LG stat.ME

classification cs.LGstat.ME
keywords quantileensembleprecipitationlearningregressionlearnersalgorithmssatellite
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Predictions in the form of probability distributions are crucial for effective decision-making. Quantile regression enables such predictions within spatial prediction settings that aim to create improved precipitation datasets by merging remote sensing and gauge data. However, ensemble learning of quantile regression algorithms remains unexplored in this context and, at the same time, it has not been substantially developed so far in the broader machine learning research landscape. Here, we introduce nine quantile-based ensemble learners and address the aforementioned gap in precipitation dataset creation by presenting the first application of these learners to large precipitation datasets. We employed a novel feature engineering strategy, which reduces the number of predictors by using distance-weighted satellite precipitation at relevant locations, combined with location elevation. Our ensemble learners include six that are based on stacking ideas and three simple methods (mean, median, best combiner). Each of them combines the following six individual algorithms: quantile regression (QR), quantile regression forests (QRF), generalized random forests (GRF), gradient boosting machines (GBM), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM), and quantile regression neural networks (QRNN). These algorithms serve as both base learners and combiners within different ensemble learning methods. We evaluated performance against a reference method (i.e., QR) using quantile scoring functions and a large dataset. The latter comprises 15 years of monthly gauge-measured and satellite precipitation in the contiguous United States (CONUS). Ensemble learning with QR and QRNN yielded the best results across the various investigated quantile levels, which range from 0.025 to 0.975, outperforming the reference method by 3.91% to 8.95%...

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantile deep learning models for multi-step ahead time series prediction

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Applying the quantile check loss to BD-LSTM, ED-LSTM, and Conv-LSTM gives multi-step forecasts with 5th-95th percentile bands at similar RMSE to the standard models on crypto and benchmark data.

Pith tools