Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bounds and Constructions of $\ell$-Read Codes under the Hamming Metric

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.11754 v1 pith:C2UJUIZB submitted 2024-03-18 cs.IT math.IT

classification cs.ITmath.IT
keywords codesreadreconstructionclassicalhamminglengthredundancyunder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Nanopore sequencing is a promising technology for DNA sequencing. In this paper, we investigate a specific model of the nanopore sequencer, which takes a $q$-ary sequence of length $n$ as input and outputs a vector of length $n+\ell-1$ referred to as an $\ell$-read vector where the $i$-th entry is a multi-set composed of the $\ell$ elements located between the $(i-\ell+1)$-th and $i$-th positions of the input sequence. Considering the presence of substitution errors in the output vector, we study $\ell$-read codes under the Hamming metric. An $\ell$-read $(n,d)_q$-code is a set of $q$-ary sequences of length $n$ in which the Hamming distance between $\ell$-read vectors of any two distinct sequences is at least $d$. We first improve the result of Banerjee \emph{et al.}, who studied $\ell$-read $(n,d)_q$-codes with the constraint $\ell\geq 3$ and $d=3$. Then, we investigate the bounds and constructions of $2$-read codes with a minimum distance of $3$, $4$, and $5$, respectively. Our results indicate that when $d \in \{3,4\}$, the optimal redundancy of $2$-read $(n,d)_q$-codes is $o(\log_q n)$, while for $d=5$ it is $\log_q n+o(\log_q n)$. Additionally, we establish an equivalence between $2$-read $(n,3)_q$-codes and classical $q$-ary single-insertion reconstruction codes using two noisy reads. We improve the lower bound on the redundancy of classical $q$-ary single-insertion reconstruction codes as well as the upper bound on the redundancy of classical $q$-ary single-deletion reconstruction codes when using two noisy reads. Finally, we study $\ell$-read codes under the reconstruction model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Binary Reconstruction Codes for Correcting One Deletion and One Substitution

    cs.IT 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For binary reconstruction codes correcting one deletion and one substitution, redundancy 0, 1, 2, log log n+3, log n+1, and 3 log n+4 suffice when the number of reads N is 4n−8, 3n−4, 2n+9, n+21, 31, and 7, respectively.

  2. Sequence Reconstruction under Channels with Multiple Bursts of Insertions or Deletions

    cs.IT 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For channels with multiple bursts of insertions or deletions of exact length b, the paper gives exact minimum read numbers: a complete formula for insertions and a binary-alphabet formula for deletions.

Pith tools