Pith. sign in

REVIEW

GPT-4V(ision) Unsuitable for Clinical Care and Education: A Clinician-Evaluated Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12046 v1 pith:4X35RIKK submitted 2023-11-14 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords gpt-4vmedicalclinicaldecision-makingeducationimageimagesinterpretation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

OpenAI's large multimodal model, GPT-4V(ision), was recently developed for general image interpretation. However, less is known about its capabilities with medical image interpretation and diagnosis. Board-certified physicians and senior residents assessed GPT-4V's proficiency across a range of medical conditions using imaging modalities such as CT scans, MRIs, ECGs, and clinical photographs. Although GPT-4V is able to identify and explain medical images, its diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making abilities are poor, posing risks to patient safety. Despite the potential that large language models may have in enhancing medical education and delivery, the current limitations of GPT-4V in interpreting medical images reinforces the importance of appropriate caution when using it for clinical decision-making.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools