REVIEW 2 cited by
Tighter Confidence Bounds for Sequential Kernel Regression
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Confidence bounds are an essential tool for rigorously quantifying the uncertainty of predictions. They are a core component in many sequential learning and decision-making algorithms, with tighter confidence bounds giving rise to algorithms with better empirical performance and better performance guarantees. In this work, we use martingale tail inequalities to establish new confidence bounds for sequential kernel regression. Our confidence bounds can be computed by solving a conic program, although this bare version quickly becomes impractical, because the number of variables grows with the sample size. However, we show that the dual of this conic program allows us to efficiently compute tight confidence bounds. We prove that our new confidence bounds are always tighter than existing ones in this setting. We apply our confidence bounds to kernel bandit problems, and we find that when our confidence bounds replace existing ones, the KernelUCB (GP-UCB) algorithm has better empirical performance, a matching worst-case performance guarantee and comparable computational cost.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Efficient kernelized bandit algorithms via exploration distributions
A unified algorithm class, Generic-GP, uses scalar exploration distributions to interpolate between UCB and randomized exploration, achieving \tilde O(\gamma_T\sqrt T) regret in kernelized bandits.
-
Confidence Sequences for Generalized Linear Models via Regret Analysis
A low-regret online predictor for any GLM yields a valid confidence sequence for the true parameter, giving a unified framework and new sample-size-independent and sparse-model bounds.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.