Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

From Handcrafted Features to LLMs: A Brief Survey for Machine Translation Quality Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.14118 v2 pith:XJOYHYPW submitted 2024-03-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords deepmethodsqualityresearcharticlechallengesdirectionsestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine Translation Quality Estimation (MTQE) is the task of estimating the quality of machine-translated text in real time without the need for reference translations, which is of great importance for the development of MT. After two decades of evolution, QE has yielded a wealth of results. This article provides a comprehensive overview of QE datasets, annotation methods, shared tasks, methodologies, challenges, and future research directions. It begins with an introduction to the background and significance of QE, followed by an explanation of the concepts and evaluation metrics for word-level QE, sentence-level QE, document-level QE, and explainable QE. The paper categorizes the methods developed throughout the history of QE into those based on handcrafted features, deep learning, and Large Language Models (LLMs), with a further division of deep learning-based methods into classic deep learning and those incorporating pre-trained language models (LMs). Additionally, the article details the advantages and limitations of each method and offers a straightforward comparison of different approaches. Finally, the paper discusses the current challenges in QE research and provides an outlook on future research directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. M-MAD: Multidimensional Multi-Agent Debate for Advanced Machine Translation Evaluation

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    M-MAD decouples MQM criteria into four dimensions and uses per-dimension multi-agent debate, achieving better WMT23 meta-evaluation scores than prior LLM-as-a-judge methods and rivaling learned metrics.

  2. The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM safety evaluation that proposes a why/what/where/how taxonomy and catalogs metrics, datasets, benchmarks, evaluators, and frameworks.

Pith tools