Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Improving the Robustness of Large Language Models via Consistency Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.14221 v2 pith:GBMQBNUO submitted 2024-03-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords responsestraininginstructionsmodelrobustnessstagealignmentconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown tremendous success in following user instructions and generating helpful responses. Nevertheless, their robustness is still far from optimal, as they may generate significantly inconsistent responses due to minor changes in the verbalized instructions. Recent literature has explored this inconsistency issue, highlighting the importance of continued improvement in the robustness of response generation. However, systematic analysis and solutions are still lacking. In this paper, we quantitatively define the inconsistency problem and propose a two-stage training framework consisting of instruction-augmented supervised fine-tuning and consistency alignment training. The first stage helps a model generalize on following instructions via similar instruction augmentations. In the second stage, we improve the diversity and help the model understand which responses are more aligned with human expectations by differentiating subtle differences in similar responses. The training process is accomplished by self-rewards inferred from the trained model at the first stage without referring to external human preference resources. We conduct extensive experiments on recent publicly available LLMs on instruction-following tasks and demonstrate the effectiveness of our training framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Certifiable Safe RLHF: Semantic Grounding and Fixed Penalty Constraint Optimization for Safer LLM Alignment

    cs.LG 2025-10 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fixed ReLU penalty and a semantically labeled cost model are proposed to make RLHF safer, but the 'certifiable' guarantee is not fully supported.

  2. Investigating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the Query Level

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Retrieval-augmented generation performance drops noticeably under minor query perturbations, with end-to-end results often tracking retriever behavior.

  3. On Adversarial Robustness and Out-of-Distribution Robustness of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims model-specific correlations between adversarial and OOD robustness in LLMs, but these are based on a tiny number of strategies and are not statistically reliable.

  4. Evaluating and Improving Robustness in Large Language Models: A Survey and Future Directions

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    LLM robustness research is organized into adversarial robustness, out-of-distribution robustness, and evaluation, with an accompanying GitHub collection of papers.

Pith tools