Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Physics mechanisms of fines detachment and migration during CO2-water corefloods

Geophysics · Submitted 21 Mar 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim To explain these phenomena, we distinguished three sequential regimes of fines detachment during two-phase displacement: (i) moving gas-water menisci; (ii) pendular rings of residual water; (iii) dry flux, and found that for the conditions of our corefloods, detachment is possible in regime (i) only.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2403.14343 (version 1)
Pith ID5BM3JZZI, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation(2) Petronas Petroliam Nasional Berhad, A.A. Abdul Manap (2), A. Badalyan (1), Adelaide, Australia, A. Zeinijahromi (1) ((1) School of Chemical Engineering, C. Nguyen (1), G. Loi (1), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), M. I. Mahamad Amir (2), N.N. Zulkifli (2), P. Bedrikovetsky (1), South Australia, S.R. Mohd Shafian (2), The University of Adelaide, T. Russell (1), Y. Yang (1). "Physics mechanisms of fines detachment and migration during CO2-water corefloods." arXiv:2403.14343 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/5BM3JZZI
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,484 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.25 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.60 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

One of the key risks for a Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) is injectivity decline. Evaporation of the connate brine in near-wellbore region during CO2 injection may result in drying-up the rock yielding the mobilisation and migration of clay particles leading to decline rock permeability and consequent loss of well injectivity. Influx of the reservoir brine into the dried-up zone yields accumulation of precipitated salt and injectivity decline. This paper presents the results of eight coreflooding experiments aiming investigation of the effect of rock dry-out, fines migration, and salt precipitation during CO2 injection. Pressure drops across the cores, brine saturation and produced clay fines concentration versus Pore Volume Injected (PVI) have been measured. All lab tests exhibit the following features: intensive fines production at the very beginning of gas-water production period following reduced-rate fines production during overall evaporation period and continuous fines disappearance at the late stage; abrupt increase in gas permeability in the middle of evaporation, and non-monotonic evaporation rate and pressure drop. To explain these phenomena, we distinguished three sequential regimes of fines detachment during two-phase displacement: (i) moving gas-water menisci; (ii) pendular rings of residual water; (iii) dry flux, and found that for the conditions of our corefloods, detachment is possible in regime (i) only. Fines production during overall evaporation period is explained by simultaneous occurrence of three regimes during unstable displacement of water by gas in micro-heterogeneous rock.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 One of the key risks for a Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) is injectivity decline. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.99
s1 Evaporation of the connate brine in near-wellbore region during CO2 injection may result in drying-up the rock yielding the mobilisation and migration of clay particles leading to decline rock permeability and consequent loss of well injectivity. background 0.99 0.12 0.08 hedged possibility 1.00
s2 Influx of the reservoir brine into the dried-up zone yields accumulation of precipitated salt and injectivity decline. background 0.97 0.16 0.05 asserted 0.97
s3 This paper presents the results of eight coreflooding experiments aiming investigation of the effect of rock dry-out, fines migration, and salt precipitation during CO2 injection. contribution 0.95 0.93 0.04 asserted 0.88
s4 Pressure drops across the cores, brine saturation and produced clay fines concentration versus Pore Volume Injected (PVI) have been measured. method 0.98 0.96 0.02 asserted 1.00
s5 All lab tests exhibit the following features: intensive fines production at the very beginning of gas-water production period following reduced-rate fines production during overall evaporation period and continuous fines disappearance at the late stage; abrupt increase in gas permeability in the middle of evaporation, and non-monotonic evaporation rate and pressure drop. result 1.00 0.96 0.16 asserted 1.00
s6 To explain these phenomena, we distinguished three sequential regimes of fines detachment during two-phase displacement: (i) moving gas-water menisci; (ii) pendular rings of residual water; (iii) dry flux, and found that for the conditions of our corefloods, detachment is possible in regime (i) only. interpretation 0.96 0.96 0.50 asserted 1.00
s7 Fines production during overall evaporation period is explained by simultaneous occurrence of three regimes during unstable displacement of water by gas in micro-heterogeneous rock. interpretation 1.00 0.86 0.19 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

One of the key risks for a Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) is injectivity decline. Evaporation of the connate brine in near-wellbore region during CO2 injection may result in drying-up the rock yielding the mobilisation and migration of clay particles leading to decline rock permeability and consequent loss of well injectivity. Influx of the reservoir brine into the dried-up zone yields accumulation of precipitated salt and injectivity decline. This paper presents the results of eight coreflooding experiments aiming investigation of the effect of rock dry-out, fines migration, and salt precipitation during CO2 injection. Pressure drops across the cores, brine saturation and produced clay fines concentration versus Pore Volume Injected (PVI) have been measured. All lab tests exhibit the following features: intensive fines production at the very beginning of gas-water production period following reduced-rate fines production during overall evaporation period and continuous fines disappearance at the late stage; abrupt increase in gas permeability in the middle of evaporation, and non-monotonic evaporation rate and pressure drop. To explain these phenomena, we distinguished three sequential regimes of fines detachment during two-phase displacement: (i) moving gas-water menisci; (ii) pendular rings of residual water; (iii) dry flux, and found that for the conditions of our corefloods, detachment is possible in regime (i) only. Fines production during overall evaporation period is explained by simultaneous occurrence of three regimes during unstable displacement of water by gas in micro-heterogeneous rock.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.