Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Foundation Models for Time Series Analysis: A Tutorial and Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.14735 v3 pith:XJZ6KRQ5 submitted 2024-03-21 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords analysisseriestimesurveydatafoundationmodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time series analysis stands as a focal point within the data mining community, serving as a cornerstone for extracting valuable insights crucial to a myriad of real-world applications. Recent advances in Foundation Models (FMs) have fundamentally reshaped the paradigm of model design for time series analysis, boosting various downstream tasks in practice. These innovative approaches often leverage pre-trained or fine-tuned FMs to harness generalized knowledge tailored for time series analysis. This survey aims to furnish a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of FMs for time series analysis. While prior surveys have predominantly focused on either application or pipeline aspects of FMs in time series analysis, they have often lacked an in-depth understanding of the underlying mechanisms that elucidate why and how FMs benefit time series analysis. To address this gap, our survey adopts a methodology-centric classification, delineating various pivotal elements of time-series FMs, including model architectures, pre-training techniques, adaptation methods, and data modalities. Overall, this survey serves to consolidate the latest advancements in FMs pertinent to time series analysis, accentuating their theoretical underpinnings, recent strides in development, and avenues for future exploration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CALM: A Framework for Continuous, Adaptive, and LLM-Mediated Anomaly Detection in Time-Series Streams

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CALM uses an LLM-as-a-Judge to curate anomalies for continuous fine-tuning of a time-series foundation model, improving anomaly detection on held-out stream segments.

  2. MoTime: A Dataset Suite for Multimodal Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MoTime provides a large multimodal forecasting benchmark and shows that external text or images can improve forecasts in some datasets, especially cold-start and sparse settings, though gains are inconsistent.

  3. Relational Conformal Prediction for Correlated Time Series

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoRel trains a graph neural network on prediction residuals to estimate quantile intervals for correlated time series, reporting narrower intervals than per-series conformal baselines on three benchmarks.

Pith tools