Pith. Sign in

RECORD

SpikeGraphormer: A High-Performance Graph Transformer with Spiking Graph Attention

Neural and Evolutionary Computing · Submitted 21 Mar 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim SpikeGraphormer consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches across various datasets and makes substantial improvements in training time, inference time, and GPU memory cost (10 ~ 20x lower than vanilla self-attention).

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2403.15480 (version 1)
Pith ID5DLTRV5R, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDongjie Zhu, Gregory O'Hared, Ning Cao, Yansong Wang, Yundong Sun, Zhaoshuo Tian. "SpikeGraphormer: A High-Performance Graph Transformer with Spiking Graph Attention." arXiv:2403.15480 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/5DLTRV5R
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,152 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.97 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.58 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.99.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Recently, Graph Transformers have emerged as a promising solution to alleviate the inherent limitations of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and enhance graph representation performance. Unfortunately, Graph Transformers are computationally expensive due to the quadratic complexity inherent in self-attention when applied over large-scale graphs, especially for node tasks. In contrast, spiking neural networks (SNNs), with event-driven and binary spikes properties, can perform energy-efficient computation. In this work, we propose a novel insight into integrating SNNs with Graph Transformers and design a Spiking Graph Attention (SGA) module. The matrix multiplication is replaced by sparse addition and mask operations. The linear complexity enables all-pair node interactions on large-scale graphs with limited GPU memory. To our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to introduce SNNs into Graph Transformers. Furthermore, we design SpikeGraphormer, a Dual-branch architecture, combining a sparse GNN branch with our SGA-driven Graph Transformer branch, which can simultaneously perform all-pair node interactions and capture local neighborhoods. SpikeGraphormer consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches across various datasets and makes substantial improvements in training time, inference time, and GPU memory cost (10 ~ 20x lower than vanilla self-attention). It also performs well in cross-domain applications (image and text classification). We release our code at https://github.com/PHD-lanyu/SpikeGraphormer.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Recently, Graph Transformers have emerged as a promising solution to alleviate the inherent limitations of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and enhance graph representation performance. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 0.62
s1 Unfortunately, Graph Transformers are computationally expensive due to the quadratic complexity inherent in self-attention when applied over large-scale graphs, especially for node tasks. background 0.89 0.07 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 In contrast, spiking neural networks (SNNs), with event-driven and binary spikes properties, can perform energy-efficient computation. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.98
s3 In this work, we propose a novel insight into integrating SNNs with Graph Transformers and design a Spiking Graph Attention (SGA) module. contribution 0.98 0.93 0.06 asserted 0.99
s4 The matrix multiplication is replaced by sparse addition and mask operations. method 0.99 0.78 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 The linear complexity enables all-pair node interactions on large-scale graphs with limited GPU memory. result 0.31 0.65 0.10 asserted 1.00
s6 To our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to introduce SNNs into Graph Transformers. contribution 0.62 0.64 0.05 asserted 0.96
s7 Furthermore, we design SpikeGraphormer, a Dual-branch architecture, combining a sparse GNN branch with our SGA-driven Graph Transformer branch, which can simultaneously perform all-pair node interactions and capture local neighborhoods. method 0.75 0.94 0.09 asserted 1.00
s8 SpikeGraphormer consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches across various datasets and makes substantial improvements in training time, inference time, and GPU memory cost (10 ~ 20x lower than vanilla self-attention). result 1.00 0.94 0.77 asserted 1.00
s9 It also performs well in cross-domain applications (image and text classification). result 1.00 0.88 0.08 asserted 0.98
s10 We release our code at https://github.com/PHD-lanyu/SpikeGraphormer. contribution 0.86 0.86 0.02 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.80.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Recently, Graph Transformers have emerged as a promising solution to alleviate the inherent limitations of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and enhance graph representation performance. Unfortunately, Graph Transformers are computationally expensive due to the quadratic complexity inherent in self-attention when applied over large-scale graphs, especially for node tasks. In contrast, spiking neural networks (SNNs), with event-driven and binary spikes properties, can perform energy-efficient computation. In this work, we propose a novel insight into integrating SNNs with Graph Transformers and design a Spiking Graph Attention (SGA) module. The matrix multiplication is replaced by sparse addition and mask operations. The linear complexity enables all-pair node interactions on large-scale graphs with limited GPU memory. To our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to introduce SNNs into Graph Transformers. Furthermore, we design SpikeGraphormer, a Dual-branch architecture, combining a sparse GNN branch with our SGA-driven Graph Transformer branch, which can simultaneously perform all-pair node interactions and capture local neighborhoods. SpikeGraphormer consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches across various datasets and makes substantial improvements in training time, inference time, and GPU memory cost (10 ~ 20x lower than vanilla self-attention). It also performs well in cross-domain applications (image and text classification). We release our code at https://github.com/PHD-lanyu/SpikeGraphormer.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Compares with it 1 paper
  • We compare the proposed with $12$ strong baselines of three categories: (1) ANN-based Euclidean GNNs: the popular GCN [ref] , GAT [ref] , GraphSAGE [ref] and SGC [ref] , (2) ANN-based Riemannian GNNs: HGCN [ref] and HyboNet [ref] of hyperbolic spaces, $κ-$GCN [ref] of the constant curvature space, and the recent $Q-$GCN [ref] of the quotient space, (3) The previous Euclidean Spiking GNNs: SpikeNet [ref] , SpikeGCN [ref] , SipkeGraphormer [ref] (termed as SpikeGT for short) and the recent SpikeGCL [ref] .

    Spiking Graph Neural Network on Riemannian Manifolds · Experimental Setups · 0.98

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper
  • We compare SpikeGraphormer with several advanced methods, including GNNs (GCN [ref] , GAT [ref] , SGC [ref] ) and advanced GNNs ($H_2GCN$ [ref] and SIGN [ref] ); Transformers-based methods (Graphormer [ref] , GraphTrans [ref] ANS-GT [ref] and Nodeformer [ref] ).

    SIGN: Scalable Inception Graph Neural Networks · Experiments · 0.99

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.