Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Object Detectors in the Open Environment: Challenges, Solutions, and Outlook

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.16271 v4 pith:XAI4CILE submitted 2024-03-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords objectdetectorsopenchallengessolutionsanalysiscomprehensiveenvironment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the emergence of foundation models, deep learning-based object detectors have shown practical usability in closed set scenarios. However, for real-world tasks, object detectors often operate in open environments, where crucial factors (e.g., data distribution, objective) that influence model learning are often changing. The dynamic and intricate nature of the open environment poses novel and formidable challenges to object detectors. Unfortunately, current research on object detectors in open environments lacks a comprehensive analysis of their distinctive characteristics, challenges, and corresponding solutions, which hinders their secure deployment in critical real-world scenarios. This paper aims to bridge this gap by conducting a comprehensive review and analysis of object detectors in open environments. We initially identified limitations of key structural components within the existing detection pipeline and propose the open environment object detector challenge framework that includes four quadrants (i.e., out-of-domain, out-of-category, robust learning, and incremental learning) based on the dimensions of the data / target changes. For each quadrant of challenges in the proposed framework, we present a detailed description and systematic analysis of the overarching goals and core difficulties, systematically review the corresponding solutions, and benchmark their performance over multiple widely adopted datasets. In addition, we engage in a discussion of open problems and potential avenues for future research. This paper aims to provide a fresh, comprehensive, and systematic understanding of the challenges and solutions associated with open-environment object detectors, thus catalyzing the development of more solid applications in real-world scenarios. A project related to this survey can be found at https://github.com/LiangSiyuan21/OEOD_Survey.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 3D Gaussian Splatting Driven Multi-View Robust Physical Adversarial Camouflage Generation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    PGA uses 3D Gaussian Splatting to generate physical adversarial camouflage from a few images, improving multi-view attack robustness on vehicle detectors.

  2. Did Models Learn Sufficiently? Attribution-Guided Training via Subset-Selected Counterfactual Augmentation

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SS-CA masks the most decision-relevant regions identified by a counterfactual subset-selection attribution and trains on the relabeled original, improving ImageNet ID/OOD accuracy by up to ~2 points in most comparisons.

  3. Adversarial Generation and Collaborative Evolution of Safety-Critical Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ScenGE generates more collision-prone autonomous driving test scenarios by combining LLM-suggested adversarial events with optimized background traffic, beating prior generators on CARLA benchmarks.

  4. Ensemble Confidence Calibration for Sound Event Detection in Open-environment

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using EOW-Softmax to calibrate a sound-occurrence branch and weighting an ensemble by that confidence improves out-of-domain sound event detection F-scores.

  5. Physical Adversarial Camouflage through Gradient Calibration and Regularization

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Nearest Gradient Calibration and Loss-Prioritized Gradient Decorrelation reduce the AP@0.5 of a camouflaged vehicle detector from 13.19% to 2.16% with YOLOv3, and improve transfer to other detectors.

Pith tools