pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.16698 · v2 · pith:BKAAC4CEnew · submitted 2024-03-25 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.str-el

Boson sampling enhanced quantum chemistry

Zhong-Xia Shang , Han-Sen Zhong , Yu-Kun Zhang , Cheng-Cheng Yu , Xiao Yuan , Chao-Yang Lu , Jian-Wei Pan , Ming-Cheng Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 08:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el
keywords boson samplingquantum chemistryvariational ansatzlinear opticselectronic structureHartree-Fockconfiguration interactionpotential energy curve
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hybrid of linear-optical boson sampling and classical chemistry methods computes molecular energies to chemical accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithm called Boson Sampling-Classic for electronic structure problems. It constructs the ansatz from non-interacting boson dynamics in a linear optical interferometer together with classical Hartree-Fock and configuration interaction processing. Permanents generated by the boson part supply state resources distinct from conventional fermionic excitations. A hybrid homodyne-plus-photon-number measurement evaluates the energy expectation value with built-in loss tolerance. Numerical runs on several molecules produce potential energy curves that reach chemical accuracy.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the Boson Sampling-Classic ansatz, formed by embedding linear optical boson sampling inside a classical Hartree-Fock plus configuration interaction framework, yields an effective variational method for molecular electronic energies. The permanent structure arising from the boson interferometer supplies complementary variational resources, and the hybrid measurement protocol permits scalable energy evaluation. Numerical experiments confirm that this combination reaches chemical accuracy on the potential energy curves of the tested molecules.

What carries the argument

Boson Sampling-Classic (BS-C) ansatz: a variational wavefunction built from non-interacting boson evolution through a linear optical interferometer combined with classical Hartree-Fock and configuration interaction post-processing.

If this is right

  • Linear optical interferometers become sufficient hardware for variational quantum chemistry calculations.
  • Permanents supply a distinct class of variational resources that can augment classical excitation-based methods.
  • Energy estimation remains feasible without fermionic statistics through the proposed hybrid measurement scheme.
  • Photon loss is mitigated intrinsically by the measurement protocol rather than by error correction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same permanent-generating mechanism could be tested on molecules too large for exact diagonalization to check whether the resource advantage persists at scale.
  • The approach opens a route to hybrid quantum-classical chemistry that bypasses the need for two-qubit gates in the quantum layer.
  • Different initial boson states or interferometer designs might further improve the accuracy-cost tradeoff without changing the classical post-processing.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid homodyne and photon-number measurement can evaluate the energy expectation value at acceptable cost and accuracy even though bosons obey no exclusion principle.

What would settle it

A calculation on one of the tested molecules that produces an energy error exceeding chemical accuracy (roughly 1.6 millihartree) relative to exact or high-level reference values would falsify the central performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2403.16698 by Chao-Yang Lu, Cheng-Cheng Yu, Han-Sen Zhong, Jian-Wei Pan, Ming-Cheng Chen, Xiao Yuan, Yu-Kun Zhang, Zhong-Xia Shang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The framework of BS-C VQE. In BS-C VQE encoding, the 0, 1 occupation of Boson, the 0, 1 of the qubit, and the 0, 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Properties of BS-C ansatz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Numerical experiments on several molecules (LiH, BeH2, and H4 with line geometry and H4 with square geometry). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Projection ratio of BS-C VQE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we give a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for solving electronic structure problems of molecules using only linear quantum optical systems. The variational ansatz we proposed is a hybrid of non-interacting Boson dynamics and classical computational chemistry methods, specifically, the Hartree-Fock method and the Configuration Interaction method. The Boson part is built by a linear optical interferometer which is easier to realize compared with the well-known Unitary Coupled Cluster (UCC) ansatz composed of quantum gates in conventional VQE and the classical part is merely classical processing acting on the Hamiltonian. We called such ansatzes Boson Sampling-Classic (BS-C). The appearance of permanents in the Boson part has its physical intuition to provide different kinds of resources from commonly used single-, double-, and higher-excitations in classical methods and the UCC ansatz to exploring chemical quantum states. Such resources can help enhance the accuracy of methods used in the classical parts. We give a scalable hybrid homodyne and photon number measurement procedure for evaluating the energy value which has intrinsic abilities to mitigate photon loss errors and discuss the extra measurement cost induced by the no Pauli exclusion principle for Bosons with its solutions. To demonstrate our proposal, we run numerical experiments on several molecules and obtain their potential energy curves reaching chemical accuracy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm (BS-C) for molecular electronic structure problems that combines linear-optical boson sampling (via interferometers) with classical Hartree-Fock and configuration-interaction methods. The bosonic component is argued to supply resources via permanents that complement single/double excitations; a hybrid homodyne/photon-number measurement protocol is introduced for energy evaluation with claimed intrinsic loss mitigation; and numerical experiments on several molecules are reported to produce potential-energy curves that reach chemical accuracy.

Significance. If the numerical results and measurement protocol hold under scrutiny, the approach would demonstrate a concrete route to quantum-enhanced chemistry that relies only on linear optics rather than gate-based universal quantum computers. The explicit use of permanents as a distinct resource class and the loss-mitigation property of the hybrid measurement are potentially valuable contributions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (numerical experiments): the claim that 'potential energy curves reaching chemical accuracy' are obtained is not accompanied by error bars, statistical uncertainties, baseline comparisons against HF, CISD, or UCCSD, or tabulation of ansatz depth and total measurement shots. Without these, the support for the central empirical claim remains limited.
  2. [Measurement protocol section] Section on the hybrid measurement protocol: while the text asserts that the homodyne-plus-photon-number procedure mitigates loss and handles bosonic occupation overhead, no explicit variance bounds, shot-count scaling, or per-molecule measurement budgets are supplied. These quantities are load-bearing for the claim of 'acceptable cost'.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Ansatz definition] Notation for the BS-C ansatz should be introduced with an explicit equation (e.g., Eq. (X)) rather than only in prose, to allow direct comparison with UCC or CI wavefunctions.
  2. [Numerical results] The manuscript should include a short table listing the molecules, basis sets, and achieved energies versus reference values to make the numerical results immediately verifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (numerical experiments): the claim that 'potential energy curves reaching chemical accuracy' are obtained is not accompanied by error bars, statistical uncertainties, baseline comparisons against HF, CISD, or UCCSD, or tabulation of ansatz depth and total measurement shots. Without these, the support for the central empirical claim remains limited.

    Authors: We agree that the presentation would be strengthened by the addition of error bars, statistical uncertainties, baseline comparisons to HF/CISD/UCCSD, and tabulation of ansatz depth and shot counts. These will be incorporated into the revised §4 and abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Measurement protocol section] Section on the hybrid measurement protocol: while the text asserts that the homodyne-plus-photon-number procedure mitigates loss and handles bosonic occupation overhead, no explicit variance bounds, shot-count scaling, or per-molecule measurement budgets are supplied. These quantities are load-bearing for the claim of 'acceptable cost'.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit variance bounds, shot-count scaling, and per-molecule budgets are needed to support the cost claim. These derivations and budgets will be added to the revised measurement-protocol section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's chain proposes the BS-C ansatz (linear-optical boson dynamics hybridized with Hartree-Fock/CI), supplies an explicit hybrid homodyne/photon-number measurement protocol whose cost and loss-mitigation properties are derived from bosonic statistics, and validates the construction by direct numerical evaluation of molecular energies. No equation reduces a reported energy or accuracy figure to a fitted parameter by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior self-work, and no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation. The numerical results are therefore independent computations rather than tautological restatements of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard assumptions of linear quantum optics and classical quantum chemistry; no new particles or forces are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linear optical interferometers can faithfully realize non-interacting boson dynamics.
    Invoked to justify the boson-sampling component of the ansatz.
  • domain assumption The hybrid homodyne and photon-number measurement can evaluate energies while mitigating photon loss.
    Central to the claimed scalability and error resilience.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5779 in / 1269 out tokens · 23956 ms · 2026-05-25T08:26:25.959020+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Simulating Chemistry on Bosonic Quantum Devices

    quant-ph 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Perspective reviewing bosonic quantum devices for simulating chemical structure, vibronic spectra, adiabatic/nonadiabatic dynamics, graph theory problems, and electronic structure.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    which has the same scaling as the quantum imple- mentation of HF ansatz UF (⃗β) of depth around O(M)

    work page

  2. [2]

    Thus, combined with the efficient error mitiga- tion method we will introduce below against the photon loss, BS-C VQE is much more hardware-efficient

    but is with the speed of light as the propagation speed. Thus, combined with the efficient error mitiga- tion method we will introduce below against the photon loss, BS-C VQE is much more hardware-efficient. What’s more, the LQOS for our proposal has the advantage of the sampling rate compared with other platforms, which is highly demanded for variational...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The resulting JW Hamiltoni- ans are 6, 8, 8, and 8 qubits

    is used for LiH, BeH2. The resulting JW Hamiltoni- ans are 6, 8, 8, and 8 qubits. We add data of FCI, HF, and CISD as references. We also show the projection ra- tios corresponding to the BS-C VQE solutions. We can see BS-C has enhancements over their classical part and can reach the chemical accuracy (1 .6 × 10−3 Hartree) at all regions. We use BS-HF for...

    work page

  4. [4]

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Reviews of modern physics 79, 135 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Bouwmeester, J.-W

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. We- infurter, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental quantum tele- portation, Nature 390, 575 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Zhong, H

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu, et al., Quantum computational advantage using photons, Sci- ence 370, 1460 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Zhong, Y.-H

    H.-S. Zhong, Y.-H. Deng, J. Qin, H. Wang, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, D. Wu, S.-Q. Gong, H. Su, et al., Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling us- ing stimulated squeezed light, Physical review letters 127, 180502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    L. S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M. F. Askarani, F. Ror- tais, T. Vincent, J. F. Bulmer, F. M. Miatto, L. Neuhaus, L. G. Helt, M. J. Collins, et al., Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor, Na- 10 ture 606, 75 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, nature 409, 46 (2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Raussendorf, D

    R. Raussendorf, D. E. Browne, and H. J. Briegel, Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states, Physical review A 68, 022312 (2003)

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Quantum computations with cold trapped ions, Physical review letters 74, 4091 (1995)

    work page 1995

  12. [12]

    Blais, R.-S

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Physical Review A 69, 062320 (2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    Aaronson and A

    S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov, The computational com- plexity of linear optics, in Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (2011) pp. 333–342

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Deng, Y.-C

    Y.-H. Deng, Y.-C. Gu, H.-L. Liu, S.-Q. Gong, H. Su, Z.- J. Zhang, H.-Y. Tang, M.-H. Jia, J.-M. Xu, M.-C. Chen, et al. , Gaussian boson sampling with pseudo-photon- number-resolving detectors and quantum computational advantage, Physical review letters 131, 150601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Banchi, M

    L. Banchi, M. Fingerhuth, T. Babej, C. Ing, and J. M. Arrazola, Molecular docking with gaussian boson sam- pling, Science advances 6, eaax1950 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    J. Huh, G. G. Guerreschi, B. Peropadre, J. R. McClean, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Boson sampling for molecular vi- bronic spectra, Nature Photonics 9, 615 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    J. M. Arrazola and T. R. Bromley, Using gaussian boson sampling to find dense subgraphs, Physical review letters 121, 030503 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and be- yond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and be- yond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    McArdle, S

    S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Quantum computational chemistry, Re- views of Modern Physics 92, 015003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru- Guzik, The theory of variational hybrid quantum- classical algorithms, New Journal of Physics 18, 023023 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Cerezo, A

    M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, K. Fujii, J. R. McClean, K. Mitarai, X. Yuan, L. Cincio, et al., Variational quantum algorithms, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Jozsa and A

    R. Jozsa and A. Miyake, Matchgates and classical simu- lation of quantum circuits, Proceedings of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 464, 3089 (2008)

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    E. J. Brandas and J. R. Sabin, Advances in quantum chemistry (Academic Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Romero, R

    J. Romero, R. Babbush, J. R. McClean, C. Hempel, P. J. Love, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Strategies for quantum com- puting molecular energies using the unitary coupled clus- ter ansatz, Quantum Science and Technology 4, 014008 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Anand, P

    A. Anand, P. Schleich, S. Alperin-Lea, P. W. Jensen, S. Sim, M. D´ ıaz-Tinoco, J. S. Kottmann, M. Degroote, A. F. Izmaylov, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, A quantum com- puting view on unitary coupled cluster theory, Chemical Society Reviews (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    D. J. Brod, Bosons vs. fermions–a computational com- plexity perspective, Revista Brasileira de Ensino de F´ ısica43 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary opera- tor, Physical review letters 73, 58 (1994)

    work page 1994

  28. [28]

    Shang, M.-C

    Z.-X. Shang, M.-C. Chen, X. Yuan, C.-Y. Lu, and J.- W. Pan, Schr\” odinger-heisenberg variational quantum algorithms, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07881 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Mizukami, K

    W. Mizukami, K. Mitarai, Y. O. Nakagawa, T. Ya- mamoto, T. Yan, and Y.-y. Ohnishi, Orbital optimized unitary coupled cluster theory for quantum computer, Physical Review Research 2, 033421 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    G. M. D’Ariano, L. Maccone, and M. F. Sacchi, Ho- modyne tomography and the reconstruction of quantum states of light, inQuantum Information With Continuous Variables of Atoms and Light (World Scientific, 2007) pp. 141–158

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaus- sian quantum information, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 621 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Chakhmakhchyan and N

    L. Chakhmakhchyan and N. J. Cerf, Boson sampling with gaussian measurements, Physical Review A 96, 032326 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    U. Baek, D. Hait, J. Shee, O. Leimkuhler, W. J. Hug- gins, T. F. Stetina, M. Head-Gordon, and K. B. Whaley, Say no to optimization: A nonorthogonal quantum eigen- solver, PRX Quantum 4, 030307 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    G. A. Quantum, Collaborators* †, F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, S. Boixo, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, et al. , Hartree- fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer, Sci- ence 369, 1084 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    H. Wang, J. Qin, X. Ding, M.-C. Chen, S. Chen, X. You, Y.-M. He, X. Jiang, L. You, Z. Wang, et al., Boson sam- pling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferome- ter in a 1 0 14-dimensional hilbert space, Physical review letters 123, 250503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Wu, W.-S

    Y. Wu, W.-S. Bao, S. Cao, F. Chen, M.-C. Chen, X. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, Y. Du, D. Fan, et al. , Strong quantum computational advantage using a super- conducting quantum processor, Physical review letters 127, 180501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    J. M. Pino, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. Allman, C. Baldwin, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer, et al., Demonstration of the trapped-ion quan- tum ccd computer architecture, Nature 592, 209 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Bluvstein, H

    D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, et al., A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays, Nature 604, 451 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Loh Jr, J

    E. Loh Jr, J. Gubernatis, R. Scalettar, S. White, D. Scalapino, and R. Sugar, Sign problem in the numeri- cal simulation of many-electron systems, Physical Review B 41, 9301 (1990)

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    A. P. Lund, M. J. Bremner, and T. C. Ralph, Quan- tum sampling problems, bosonsampling and quantum supremacy, npj Quantum Information 3, 15 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Olivares, A

    S. Olivares, A. Allevi, G. Caiazzo, M. G. Paris, and M. Bondani, Quantum tomography of light states by photon-number-resolving detectors, New Journal of Physics 21, 103045 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Huang, R

    H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measure- 11 ments, Nature Physics 16, 1050 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    X. Ding, Y. He, Z.-C. Duan, N. Gregersen, M.-C. Chen, S. Unsleber, S. Maier, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. H¨ ofling, et al. , On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a res- onantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar, Physical review letters 116, 020401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nature nanotechnology 12, 1026 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Zavatta, J

    A. Zavatta, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and M. Bellini, A high-fidelity noiseless amplifier for quantum light states, Nature Pho- tonics 5, 52 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    Raffaelli, G

    F. Raffaelli, G. Ferranti, D. H. Mahler, P. Sibson, J. E. Kennard, A. Santamato, G. Sinclair, D. Bonneau, M. G. Thompson, and J. C. Matthews, A homodyne detector integrated onto a photonic chip for measuring quantum states and generating random numbers, Quantum Sci- ence and Technology 3, 025003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Cross, The ibm q experience and qiskit open-source quantum computing software, in APS March meeting ab- stracts, Vol

    A. Cross, The ibm q experience and qiskit open-source quantum computing software, in APS March meeting ab- stracts, Vol. 2018 (2018) pp. L58–003

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    J. R. McClean, N. C. Rubin, K. J. Sung, I. D. Kivlichan, X. Bonet-Monroig, Y. Cao, C. Dai, E. S. Fried, C. Gid- ney, B. Gimby, et al., Openfermion: the electronic struc- ture package for quantum computers, Quantum Science and Technology 5, 034014 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Q. Sun, T. C. Berkelbach, N. S. Blunt, G. H. Booth, S. Guo, Z. Li, J. Liu, J. D. McClain, E. R. Sayfutyarova, S. Sharma, et al., Pyscf: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 8, e1340 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    B. Gupt, J. Izaac, and N. Quesada, The walrus: a library for the calculation of hafnians, hermite polynomials and gaussian boson sampling, Journal of Open Source Soft- ware 4, 1705 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Example codes, https://github.com/ustcszx/ BS-C-VQE (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Paini, A

    M. Paini, A. Kalev, D. Padilha, and B. Ruck, Estimating expectation values using approximate quantum states, Quantum 5, 413 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Van Kempen and L

    G. Van Kempen and L. Van Vliet, Mean and variance of ratio estimators used in fluorescence ratio imaging, Cytometry: The Journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology 39, 300 (2000). Appendix A: Homodyne measurement First, consider a single mode [27]. An operator H can be expressed in the coherent state basis: H = Z d2α π T r[HD †(α)]D(α) =...

    work page 2000