RECORD
Primitive elements in the Hall algebra of a cyclic quiver
Representation Theory · Submitted 26 Mar 2024
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We provide an explicit formula for primitive elements in the Hall algebras of nilpotent representations of cyclic quivers.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We provide an explicit formula for primitive elements in the Hall algebras of nilpotent representations of cyclic quivers.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We provide an explicit formula for primitive elements in the Hall algebras of nilpotent representations of cyclic quivers. | contribution 0.84 | 0.95 | 0.92 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We provide an explicit formula for primitive elements in the Hall algebras of nilpotent representations of cyclic quivers.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label
Cites as background 2 papers
-
The main reference in this section is from [ref] and [ref] .
math.RT/0611617 · Comultiplication on $$ · 0.92
-
Bridgeland defined a twisted Hall algebra $𝐃𝐇(𝒜)$ over $ℤ_2-graded$ complexes for any finitary category $𝒜$ in [ref] .
A note on Bridgeland's Hall algebra of two-periodic complexes · Primitive elements for Hall algebra of 2-periodic complexes · 0.96
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.