REVIEW 3 cited by
Gravitational helicity flux density from two-body systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The helicity flux density is a novel quantity which characterizes the angle-dependence of the helicity of radiative gravitons and it may be tested by gravitational wave experiments in the future. We derive a quadrupole formula for the helicity flux density due to gravitational radiation in the slow motion and the weak field limit. We apply the formula to the bound and unbound orbits in two-body systems and find that the total radiative helicity fluxes are always zero. However, the radiative helicity flux density, which is $\mathcal{O}(G^3)$ in the Newtonian limit, still has non-trivial dependence on the angle. Furthermore, we also find a formula for the total helicity flux by including all contributions of the higher multipoles.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Quantum flux operators in the fermionic theory and their supersymmetric extension
The paper derives fermionic quantum flux operators at null infinity, finds an anomalous helicity flux from superrotation commutators, and shows the resulting algebra reduces to super-BMS and R-extended super-Poincaré ...
-
Covariant variation and its applications
A metric-compatible covariant variation of tensors has a non-closure anomaly that reproduces electromagnetic helicity flux under superrotations and generalizes to higher-spin and p-form radiative data.
-
Constraining bulk-to-boundary correlators under Poincar\'e symmetry
Poincaré symmetry plus null-infinity fall-off conditions force scalar bulk-to-boundary correlators to 1/(u+n·x)^Δ and fermionic ones to a sum of 1/(u+n·x)^Δ and /n/(u+n·x)^(Δ+1) branches.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.