RECORD
Blockchains, MEV and the knapsack problem: a primer
General Economics · Submitted 28 Mar 2024
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Consequently, this paper highlights the role of designing auctions to fill a knapsack--or knapsack auctions--in alleviating the MEV problem.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In this paper, we take a close look at a problem labeled maximal extractable value (MEV), which arises in a blockchain due to the ability of a block producer to manipulate the order of transactions within a block. Indeed, blockchains such as Ethereum have spent considerable resources addressing this issue and have redesigned the block production process to account for MEV. This paper provides an overview of the MEV problem and tracks how Ethereum has adapted to its presence. A vital aspect of the block building exercise is that it is a variant of the knapsack problem. Consequently, this paper highlights the role of designing auctions to fill a knapsack--or knapsack auctions--in alleviating the MEV problem. Overall, this paper presents a survey of the main issues and an accessible primer for researchers and students wishing to explore the economics of block building and MEV further.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In this paper, we take a close look at a problem labeled maximal extractable value (MEV), which arises in a blockchain due to the ability of a block producer to manipulate the order of transactions within a block. | background 0.84 | 0.19 | 0.06 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Indeed, blockchains such as Ethereum have spent considerable resources addressing this issue and have redesigned the block production process to account for MEV. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | This paper provides an overview of the MEV problem and tracks how Ethereum has adapted to its presence. | contribution 0.99 | 0.77 | 0.09 | asserted 0.98 |
| s3 | A vital aspect of the block building exercise is that it is a variant of the knapsack problem. | background 0.55 | 0.29 | 0.15 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | Consequently, this paper highlights the role of designing auctions to fill a knapsack--or knapsack auctions--in alleviating the MEV problem. | contribution 0.83 | 0.27 | 0.43 | asserted 0.93 |
| s5 | Overall, this paper presents a survey of the main issues and an accessible primer for researchers and students wishing to explore the economics of block building and MEV further. | contribution 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.14 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In this paper, we take a close look at a problem labeled maximal extractable value (MEV), which arises in a blockchain due to the ability of a block producer to manipulate the order of transactions within a block. Indeed, blockchains such as Ethereum have spent considerable resources addressing this issue and have redesigned the block production process to account for MEV. This paper provides an overview of the MEV problem and tracks how Ethereum has adapted to its presence. A vital aspect of the block building exercise is that it is a variant of the knapsack problem. Consequently, this paper highlights the role of designing auctions to fill a knapsack--or knapsack auctions--in alleviating the MEV problem. Overall, this paper presents a survey of the main issues and an accessible primer for researchers and students wishing to explore the economics of block building and MEV further.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Papers citing it
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
The problem of block building has historically been modeled as a Knapsack Problem, optimizing fee revenue under a gas limit [ref] .
Perils of Parallelism: Transaction Fee Mechanisms under Execution Uncertainty · Related Work · 0.93
What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label
Cites as background 2 papers
-
We summarize the implications of both of these below; [ref] presents an excellent in-depth analysis of EIP-1559 and the mechanism design behind it.
Transaction Fee Mechanism Design for the Ethereum Blockchain: An Economic Analysis of EIP-1559 · EIP - 1559 · 0.88
-
The classic work on MEV which introduced this idea in a formal way (albeit as miner extractable value instead of maximal extractable value) remains [ref] .]
Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges · Value extraction · 0.96
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.