Measuring Taiwanese Mandarin Language Understanding
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:EFNXFH6Qrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has drawn substantial attention in the field recently. This work focuses on evaluating LLMs in a Chinese context, specifically, for Traditional Chinese which has been largely underrepresented in existing benchmarks. We present TMLU, a holistic evaluation suit tailored for assessing the advanced knowledge and reasoning capability in LLMs, under the context of Taiwanese Mandarin. TMLU consists of an array of 37 subjects across social science, STEM, humanities, Taiwan-specific content, and others, ranging from middle school to professional levels. In addition, we curate chain-of-thought-like few-shot explanations for each subject to facilitate the evaluation of complex reasoning skills. To establish a comprehensive baseline, we conduct extensive experiments and analysis on 24 advanced LLMs. The results suggest that Chinese open-weight models demonstrate inferior performance comparing to multilingual proprietary ones, and open-weight models tailored for Taiwanese Mandarin lag behind the Simplified-Chinese counterparts. The findings indicate great headrooms for improvement, and emphasize the goal of TMLU to foster the development of localized Taiwanese-Mandarin LLMs. We release the benchmark and evaluation scripts for the community to promote future research.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
TW-LegalBench: Measuring Taiwanese Legal Understanding
TW-LegalBench evaluates 13 LLMs on over 30,000 Taiwanese legal tasks from exams and judgments, showing top models pass lawyer thresholds but struggle with exact statute citations.
-
BlueMagpie-TTS: A Token-Efficient Tokenizer, Language Model, and TTS for Taiwanese-Accent Code-Switching Speech
A Taiwan-specific tokenizer, language model, and bridge to a reused acoustic stack cut code-switching TTS CER from 11.45% to 4.81%, with 65.6% listener preference.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.