REVIEW 2 cited by
Complementarity in Human-AI Collaboration: Concept, Sources, and Evidence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to significantly enhance human performance across various domains. Ideally, collaboration between humans and AI should result in complementary team performance (CTP) -- a level of performance that neither of them can attain individually. So far, however, CTP has rarely been observed, suggesting an insufficient understanding of the principle and the application of complementarity. Therefore, we develop a general concept of complementarity and formalize its theoretical potential as well as the actual realized effect in decision-making situations. Moreover, we identify information and capability asymmetry as the two key sources of complementarity. Finally, we illustrate the impact of each source on complementarity potential and effect in two empirical studies. Our work provides researchers with a comprehensive theoretical foundation of human-AI complementarity in decision-making and demonstrates that leveraging these sources constitutes a viable pathway towards designing effective human-AI collaboration, i.e., the realization of CTP.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Plan-Then-Execute: An Empirical Study of User Trust and Team Performance When Using LLM Agents As A Daily Assistant
User involvement in plan-then-execute LLM agents fails to calibrate trust and only inconsistently improves performance, while plausible but wrong plans can mislead users into over-trust.
-
DeCoDe: Defer-and-Complement Decision-Making via Decoupled Concept Bottleneck Models
DeCoDe combines concept bottleneck models with learning to defer to select per-instance among AI-only, human-only, and AI+human strategies, reporting accuracy gains over binary deferral baselines on three image datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.