Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Efficient Data-Free Model Stealing with Label Diversity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.00108 v1 pith:XEE6Z543 submitted 2024-03-29 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords attackmodelstealinglearningmachineattackscomponentsconjecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning as a Service (MLaaS) allows users to query the machine learning model in an API manner, which provides an opportunity for users to enjoy the benefits brought by the high-performance model trained on valuable data. This interface boosts the proliferation of machine learning based applications, while on the other hand, it introduces the attack surface for model stealing attacks. Existing model stealing attacks have relaxed their attack assumptions to the data-free setting, while keeping the effectiveness. However, these methods are complex and consist of several components, which obscure the core on which the attack really depends. In this paper, we revisit the model stealing problem from a diversity perspective and demonstrate that keeping the generated data samples more diverse across all the classes is the critical point for improving the attack performance. Based on this conjecture, we provide a simplified attack framework. We empirically signify our conjecture by evaluating the effectiveness of our attack, and experimental results show that our approach is able to achieve comparable or even better performance compared with the state-of-the-art method. Furthermore, benefiting from the absence of redundant components, our method demonstrates its advantages in attack efficiency and query budget.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. I Stolenly Swear That I Am Up to (No) Good: Design and Evaluation of Model Stealing Attacks

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematization of 47 model stealing papers that introduces a threat model, a comparison framework, and evaluation best practices for substitute-model attacks.

  2. HoneypotNet: Backdoor Attacks Against Model Extraction

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A defender can inject a backdoor into a stolen copy of a model by poisoning the output probabilities of the original model, without retraining it or adding triggers to user-visible images.

Pith tools