REVIEW 1 cited by
A Theory for Length Generalization in Learning to Reason
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Length generalization (LG) is a challenging problem in learning to reason. It refers to the phenomenon that when trained on reasoning problems of smaller lengths or sizes, the resulting model struggles with problems of larger sizes or lengths. Although LG has been studied by many researchers, the challenge remains. This paper proposes a theoretical study of LG for problems whose reasoning processes can be modeled as DAGs (directed acyclic graphs). The paper first identifies and proves the conditions under which LG can be achieved in learning to reason. It then designs problem representations based on the theory to learn to solve challenging reasoning problems like parity, addition, and multiplication, using a Transformer to achieve perfect LG.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Saving for the future: Enhancing generalization via partial logic regularization
PL-Reg adds a trainable mask and a defined/undefined classification loss to logic-based regularization, improving unknown-class accuracy across GCD, mDG+GCD, and CIL benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.