REVIEW 2 cited by
LexAbSumm: Aspect-based Summarization of Legal Decisions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Legal professionals frequently encounter long legal judgments that hold critical insights for their work. While recent advances have led to automated summarization solutions for legal documents, they typically provide generic summaries, which may not meet the diverse information needs of users. To address this gap, we introduce LexAbSumm, a novel dataset designed for aspect-based summarization of legal case decisions, sourced from the European Court of Human Rights jurisdiction. We evaluate several abstractive summarization models tailored for longer documents on LexAbSumm, revealing a challenge in conditioning these models to produce aspect-specific summaries. We release LexAbSum to facilitate research in aspect-based summarization for legal domain.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
RELexED: Retrieval-Enhanced Legal Summarization with Exemplar Diversity
Diverse, influence-function-scored exemplar summaries retrieved with a DPP improve legal summarization over no-exemplar and similarity-only baselines on SuperSCOTUS and CivilSum, with modest and statistically partial gains.
-
Aspect-Based Summarization with Self-Aspect Retrieval Enhanced Generation
SARESG prunes documents to aspect-relevant sentences via embedding similarity before LLM summarization, reporting gains over selective-context baselines on three datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.