Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exploring the Nexus of Large Language Models and Legal Systems: A Short Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.00990 v1 pith:Z5JBFYFV submitted 2024-04-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords legalllmssurveylanguagevariouschallengesdomainlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs), there is a profound transformation occurring in the realm of natural language processing tasks within the legal domain. The capabilities of LLMs are increasingly demonstrating unique roles in the legal sector, bringing both distinctive benefits and various challenges. This survey delves into the synergy between LLMs and the legal system, such as their applications in tasks like legal text comprehension, case retrieval, and analysis. Furthermore, this survey highlights key challenges faced by LLMs in the legal domain, including bias, interpretability, and ethical considerations, as well as how researchers are addressing these issues. The survey showcases the latest advancements in fine-tuned legal LLMs tailored for various legal systems, along with legal datasets available for fine-tuning LLMs in various languages. Additionally, it proposes directions for future research and development.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical Governance

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature review that classifies LLM-for-law research using a dual-lens taxonomy of Toulmin argumentation components and legal practitioner roles.

  2. SafeMate: A Modular RAG-Based Agent for Context-Aware Emergency Guidance

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A modular retrieval-augmented agent for emergency guidance is claimed to beat GPT-4o and GPT-3.5, but the supporting evaluation is automated, unaudited, and not released.

Pith tools