Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MagLive: Robust Voice Liveness Detection on Smartphones Using Magnetic Pattern Changes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.01106 v2 pith:KT3YMEIE submitted 2024-04-01 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords maglivevoicesmartphonesdetectionhumanslivenessloudspeakersmagnetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Voice authentication has been widely used on smartphones. However, it remains vulnerable to spoofing attacks, where the attacker replays recorded voice samples from authentic humans using loudspeakers to bypass the voice authentication system. In this paper, we present MagLive, a robust voice liveness detection scheme designed for smartphones to mitigate such spoofing attacks. MagLive leverages the differences in magnetic pattern changes generated by different speakers (i.e., humans or loudspeakers) when speaking for liveness detection, which are captured by the built-in magnetometer on smartphones. To extract effective and robust magnetic features, MagLive utilizes a TF-CNN-SAF model as the feature extractor, which includes a time-frequency convolutional neural network (TF-CNN) combined with a self-attention-based fusion (SAF) model. Supervised contrastive learning is then employed to achieve user-irrelevance, device-irrelevance, and content-irrelevance. MagLive imposes no additional burden on users and does not rely on active sensing or specialized hardware. We conducted comprehensive experiments with various settings to evaluate the security and robustness of MagLive. Our results demonstrate that MagLive effectively distinguishes between humans and attackers (i.e., loudspeakers), achieving an average balanced accuracy (BAC) of 99.01% and an equal error rate (EER) of 0.77%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. WAFBOOSTER: Automatic Boosting of WAF Security Against Mutated Malicious Payloads

    cs.CR 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    WAFBOOSTER combines a shadow model, an RNN payload generator, and automatic signature extraction to harden web application firewalls, but its headline rejection-rate improvement is measured on the same payloads used t...

Pith tools