pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.02696 · v2 · submitted 2024-04-03 · 💻 cs.LG

Deep Privacy Funnel Model: From a Discriminative to a Generative Approach with an Application to Face Recognition

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords privacy funnelface recognitionrepresentation learningvariational boundinformation leakagegenerative modelsprivacy utility tradeoff
0
0 comments X

The pith

The deep variational privacy funnel model bounds information leakage in trainable face recognition systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the information-theoretic privacy funnel to deep representation learning for face recognition. It proposes both a discriminative and a generative formulation, along with a variational approximation that makes the privacy-utility optimization tractable in end-to-end neural network training. The framework aims to minimize leakage of sensitive attributes while preserving recognition utility under logarithmic loss. It demonstrates compatibility with existing face recognition architectures and links the approach to generative modeling techniques.

Core claim

The DVPF framework, associated with both the DisPF and GenPF models, yields a tractable variational bound for measuring information leakage and enables optimization in deep representation-learning settings, providing a controllable privacy-utility trade-off while substantially reducing leakage about sensitive attributes.

What carries the argument

The deep variational privacy funnel (DVPF) that supplies a variational bound on mutual information leakage between representations and sensitive attributes.

If this is right

  • The framework supports end-to-end training of privacy-preserving face recognition networks.
  • It achieves a controllable trade-off between recognition utility and reduction in sensitive attribute leakage.
  • The approach integrates with modern networks such as AdaFace and ArcFace.
  • Connections are clarified between privacy funnels and models including VAEs, GANs, and diffusion models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The generative formulation may enable creation of privacy-protected synthetic face data.
  • Similar variational bounds could be applied to privacy in other representation learning tasks such as speaker verification.
  • Optimization under the bound might reveal new ways to regularize deep networks against attribute inference attacks.

Load-bearing premise

The variational bound in the DVPF model accurately captures and bounds the true information leakage about sensitive attributes in the end-to-end trainable deep network setting.

What would settle it

Training a face recognition model with the DVPF objective and then measuring actual mutual information leakage that exceeds the reported variational bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.02696 by Behrooz Razeghi, Parsa Rahimi, S\'ebastien Marcel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: High-level schematic comparison of privacy funnel models: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparative overview of generalized privacy funnel (PF) approaches: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Information diagrams for S−◦−X−◦−Z. (a) entropy H (S), H (X), H (Z), and revealed useful (preserved) information I(X; Z) and information leakage I(S; Z); (b) residual information I(X; Z | S) and residual information I(S; X | Z); (c) private attribute uncer￾tainty H (S|X), useful information decoding uncertainty H (X|Z), and encoding uncertainty H (Z|X). (generator) PXe |Ze, which can function in either a p… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of the Generative Privacy Funnel in (a) face recognition systems and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Core architectural components of the (a) deep discriminative privacy funnel and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The training architectures associated with: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Training the deep variational DisPF model for face recognition experiments, employing the learning scenario ‘Embedding-Based Data Learning’. Trained DisPF Module X Trained Encoder Z Trained Decoder Xutility (a) Trained GenPF Module X S Trained Encoder Z Trained Conditional Generator Xuncertainty (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The DisPF and GenPF modules have been trained and are designed for integration in a plug-and-play manner. These modules are characterized by a set of specific parameters: ‘dataset name’ (for example, FairFace), which denotes the dataset utilized; ‘sensitive attribute name’ (e.g., Race); ‘alpha’ (e.g., 0.1); ‘latent Z dimension’ (e.g., 128); ‘backbone’ (e.g., iResNet 50); ‘loss function’ (e.g., arcface); an… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Evaluating the performance of the deep variational [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Trade-off between information utility and privacy leakage using DVPF models for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Trade-off between information utility and privacy leakage using DVPF models for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: t-SNE visualizations of the FairFace dataset with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: t-SNE visualizations of the FairFace dataset with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Normalized confusion matrices for the FairFace dataset, considering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: t-SNE visualizations of 16 randomly selected identities on the IJB-C dataset: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this study, we apply the information-theoretic Privacy Funnel (PF) model to face recognition and develop a method for privacy-preserving representation learning within an end-to-end trainable framework. Our approach addresses the trade-off between utility and obfuscation of sensitive information under logarithmic loss. We study the integration of information-theoretic privacy principles with representation learning, with a particular focus on face recognition systems. We also highlight the compatibility of the proposed framework with modern face recognition networks such as AdaFace and ArcFace. In addition, we introduce the Generative Privacy Funnel ($\mathsf{GenPF}$) model, which extends the traditional discriminative PF formulation, referred to here as the Discriminative Privacy Funnel ($\mathsf{DisPF}$). The proposed $\mathsf{GenPF}$ model extends the privacy-funnel framework to generative formulations under information-theoretic and estimation-theoretic criteria. Complementing these developments, we present the deep variational PF (DVPF) model, which yields a tractable variational bound for measuring information leakage and enables optimization in deep representation-learning settings. The DVPF framework, associated with both the $\mathsf{DisPF}$ and $\mathsf{GenPF}$ models, also clarifies connections with generative models such as variational autoencoders (VAEs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), and diffusion models. Finally, we validate the framework on modern face recognition systems and show that it provides a controllable privacy--utility trade-off while substantially reducing leakage about sensitive attributes. To support reproducibility, we also release a PyTorch implementation of the proposed framework.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the information-theoretic Privacy Funnel to face recognition and introduces the Deep Variational Privacy Funnel (DVPF) framework. This includes the Discriminative Privacy Funnel (DisPF) and the new Generative Privacy Funnel (GenPF) models. DVPF supplies a tractable variational bound on information leakage that is end-to-end optimizable with modern face-recognition backbones (AdaFace, ArcFace) under logarithmic loss, yields a controllable privacy-utility trade-off, and substantially reduces leakage about sensitive attributes. Connections to VAEs, GANs and diffusion models are noted, and PyTorch code is released.

Significance. If the variational bound is a valid upper bound on I(S;Z) and the experiments confirm that its minimization reduces actual leakage, the work would supply a principled, information-theoretic tool for privacy-preserving representation learning that is compatible with current face-recognition pipelines. The explicit release of reproducible code strengthens the contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [DVPF model description] DVPF paragraph (abstract and corresponding methods section): the central claim that DVPF 'yields a tractable variational bound for measuring information leakage' and enables minimization of leakage is load-bearing. The manuscript must supply the explicit derivation showing that the chosen variational family produces a valid upper bound on the mutual information I(S;Z), together with any assumptions required for the bound to remain tight when the representation network is trained end-to-end.
  2. [Experiments and results] Experimental section: the claim of 'substantially reducing leakage about sensitive attributes' requires direct evidence that the variational surrogate correlates with the true leakage. The paper should report an independent estimator of I(S;Z) (or a tight lower bound) on the learned representations before and after DVPF optimization, rather than relying solely on the value of the variational objective.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction / Model definitions] Notation for the two PF variants (DisPF and GenPF) is introduced only in the abstract; a short dedicated subsection clarifying the precise optimization objectives and the role of the variational bound for each variant would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the recommendation for major revision. We address each major comment below, agreeing that additional details are needed for clarity and validation. We will incorporate the requested changes in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: DVPF paragraph (abstract and corresponding methods section): the central claim that DVPF 'yields a tractable variational bound for measuring information leakage' and enables minimization of leakage is load-bearing. The manuscript must supply the explicit derivation showing that the chosen variational family produces a valid upper bound on the mutual information I(S;Z), together with any assumptions required for the bound to remain tight when the representation network is trained end-to-end.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit derivation is essential for rigor. The current manuscript states the bound but does not provide the full step-by-step derivation from the variational family to the upper bound on I(S;Z). In the revision we will add this derivation in the methods section, specifying the variational family (the form of q(z|s) and any auxiliary distributions), the Jensen or other inequality used, and the assumptions (e.g., the Markov chain S-X-Z and the support conditions) under which the bound remains valid and reasonably tight during end-to-end training of the representation network. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Experimental section: the claim of 'substantially reducing leakage about sensitive attributes' requires direct evidence that the variational surrogate correlates with the true leakage. The paper should report an independent estimator of I(S;Z) (or a tight lower bound) on the learned representations before and after DVPF optimization, rather than relying solely on the value of the variational objective.

    Authors: We acknowledge that relying solely on the variational objective leaves open the question of how well the surrogate tracks actual leakage. While the variational upper bound is the quantity we optimize, an independent check would strengthen the empirical claims. In the revision we will add results from a separate neural MI estimator (e.g., a MINE-style lower bound or a histogram-based estimator on held-out data) computed on the representations before and after DVPF training, and we will report the correlation between the variational objective and this independent estimate across the privacy-utility operating points. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: DVPF variational bound presented as extension of information-theoretic PF without reduction to self-fit or self-citation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and reader's assessment show the central claim as an extension of established PF principles to deep representation learning via a new variational bound (DVPF) for DisPF/GenPF. No quoted equations or sections reduce the bound, the privacy-utility trade-off, or the leakage reduction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is internal only. The framework is described as compatible with existing networks (AdaFace, ArcFace) and validated empirically, with code release for reproducibility. This satisfies the default expectation of a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks; no load-bearing step exhibits the required reduction by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard information-theoretic definitions of the privacy funnel under logarithmic loss and the validity of a variational bound for leakage measurement; no free parameters or invented physical entities are described in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Privacy funnel trade-off under logarithmic loss between utility and obfuscation of sensitive information
    Invoked as the foundation for both DisPF and GenPF formulations in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Variational bound provides a tractable surrogate for information leakage in deep networks
    Central to the DVPF model enabling optimization; stated without further justification in the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • Generative Privacy Funnel (GenPF) no independent evidence
    purpose: Extend traditional discriminative PF to generative formulations under information-theoretic and estimation-theoretic criteria
    New model introduced by the paper; no independent evidence outside the work is mentioned.
  • Deep Variational Privacy Funnel (DVPF) no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide tractable variational bound for measuring leakage and enabling deep optimization
    New formulation introduced to connect PF with VAEs, GANs, and diffusion models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5826 in / 1558 out tokens · 29383 ms · 2026-05-24T01:56:44.056025+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

271 extracted references · 271 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.ncblock write newline " " before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION new.nccont write " " before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip out...

  2. [2]

    11em plus .33em minus .07em 4000 4000 100 4000 4000 500 `\.=1000 = #1 \@IEEEnotcompsoconly \@IEEEcompsoconly #1 * [1] 0pt [0pt][0pt] #1 * [1] 0pt [0pt][0pt] #1 * \| ** #1 \@IEEEauthorblockNstyle \@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly \@IEEEauthorblockAstyle \@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly \@IEEEcompsocconfonly \@IEEEauthordefaulttextstyle \@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly \@IEEEauthor...

  3. [3]

    Deep learning with differential privacy

    Martin Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian Goodfellow, H Brendan McMahan, Ilya Mironov, Kunal Talwar, and Li Zhang. Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pages 308--318, 2016

  4. [4]

    Biometric template attacks and recent protection mechanisms: A survey

    Sani M Abdullahi, Shuifa Sun, Beng Wang, Ning Wei, and Hongxia Wang. Biometric template attacks and recent protection mechanisms: A survey. Information Fusion, 103: 0 102144, 2024

  5. [5]

    A review of state-of-the-art in face presentation attack detection: From early development to advanced deep learning and multi-modal fusion methods

    Faseela Abdullakutty, Eyad Elyan, and Pamela Johnston. A review of state-of-the-art in face presentation attack detection: From early development to advanced deep learning and multi-modal fusion methods. Information fusion, 75: 0 55--69, 2021

  6. [6]

    Privacy-preserving data mining

    Rakesh Agrawal and Ramakrishnan Srikant. Privacy-preserving data mining. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 439--450, 2000

  7. [7]

    Deep Variational Information Bottleneck

    Alexander A Alemi, Ian Fischer, Joshua V Dillon, and Kevin Murphy. Deep variational information bottleneck. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.00410, 2016

  8. [8]

    A general class of coefficients of divergence of one distribution from another

    Syed Mumtaz Ali and Samuel D Silvey. A general class of coefficients of divergence of one distribution from another. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 28 0 (1): 0 131--142, 1966

  9. [9]

    Genattack: Practical black-box attacks with gradient-free optimization

    Moustafa Alzantot, Yash Sharma, Supriyo Chakraborty, Huan Zhang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, and Mani B Srivastava. Genattack: Practical black-box attacks with gradient-free optimization. In Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference, pages 1111--1119, 2019

  10. [10]

    Learning representations for neural network-based classification using the information bottleneck principle

    Rana Ali Amjad and Bernhard Claus Geiger. Learning representations for neural network-based classification using the information bottleneck principle. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2019

  11. [11]

    Openface: A general-purpose face recognition library with mobile applications

    Brandon Amos, Bartosz Ludwiczuk, and Mahadev Satyanarayanan. Openface: A general-purpose face recognition library with mobile applications. Technical report, CMU-CS-16-118, CMU School of Computer Science, 2016

  12. [12]

    Information measures and capacity of order for discrete memoryless channels

    Suguru Arimoto. Information measures and capacity of order for discrete memoryless channels. Topics in Information Theory, 16: 0 41--52, 1977

  13. [13]

    Bottleneck problems: An information and estimation-theoretic view

    Shahab Asoodeh and Flavio P Calmon. Bottleneck problems: An information and estimation-theoretic view. Entropy, 22 0 (11): 0 1325, 2020

  14. [14]

    Notes on information-theoretic privacy

    Shahab Asoodeh, Fady Alajaji, and Tam \'a s Linder. Notes on information-theoretic privacy. In 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, pages 1272--1278. IEEE, 2014

  15. [15]

    Information extraction under privacy constraints

    Shahab Asoodeh, Mario Diaz, Fady Alajaji, and Tam \'a s Linder. Information extraction under privacy constraints. Information, 7 0 (1): 0 15, 2016

  16. [16]

    Estimation efficiency under privacy constraints

    Shahab Asoodeh, Mario Diaz, Fady Alajaji, and Tam \'a s Linder. Estimation efficiency under privacy constraints. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 65 0 (3): 0 1512--1534, 2018

  17. [17]

    Local differential privacy is equivalent to contraction of an f -divergence

    Shahab Asoodeh, Maryam Aliakbarpour, and Flavio P Calmon. Local differential privacy is equivalent to contraction of an f -divergence. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), pages 545--550. IEEE, 2021

  18. [18]

    Variational leakage: The role of information complexity in privacy leakage

    Amir Ahooye Atashin, Behrooz Razeghi, Deniz G \"u nd \"u z, and Slava Voloshynovskiy. Variational leakage: The role of information complexity in privacy leakage. In 3rd ACM Workshop on Wireless Security and Machine Learning, pages 91--96, 2021

  19. [19]

    Privacy in epigenetics: Temporal linkability of \ MicroRNA \ expression profiles

    Michael Backes, Pascal Berrang, Anna Hecksteden, Mathias Humbert, Andreas Keller, and Tim Meyer. Privacy in epigenetics: Temporal linkability of \ MicroRNA \ expression profiles. In 25th USENIX security symposium (USENIX Security 16), pages 1223--1240, 2016

  20. [20]

    Explaining a black-box using deep variational information bottleneck approach

    Seojin Bang, Pengtao Xie, Heewook Lee, Wei Wu, and Eric Xing. Explaining a black-box using deep variational information bottleneck approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06918, 2019

  21. [21]

    On privacy-utility tradeoffs for constrained data release mechanisms

    Yuksel Ozan Basciftci, Ye Wang, and Prakash Ishwar. On privacy-utility tradeoffs for constrained data release mechanisms. In Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2016

  22. [22]

    Fast and accurate likelihood ratio-based biometric verification secure against malicious adversaries

    Amina Bassit, Florian Hahn, Joep Peeters, Tom Kevenaar, Raymond Veldhuis, and Andreas Peter. Fast and accurate likelihood ratio-based biometric verification secure against malicious adversaries. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, 16: 0 5045--5060, 2021

  23. [23]

    \ CSI \ \ NN \ : Reverse engineering of neural network architectures through electromagnetic side channel

    Lejla Batina, Shivam Bhasin, Dirmanto Jap, and Stjepan Picek. \ CSI \ \ NN \ : Reverse engineering of neural network architectures through electromagnetic side channel. In 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19), pages 515--532, 2019

  24. [24]

    A survey on privacy in social media: Identification, mitigation, and applications

    Ghazaleh Beigi and Huan Liu. A survey on privacy in social media: Identification, mitigation, and applications. ACM Transactions on Data Science, 1 0 (1): 0 1--38, 2020

  25. [25]

    Mutual information neural estimation

    Mohamed Ishmael Belghazi, Aristide Baratin, Sai Rajeshwar, Sherjil Ozair, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Devon Hjelm. Mutual information neural estimation. In International conference on machine learning, pages 531--540. PMLR, 2018

  26. [26]

    Practical black-box attacks on deep neural networks using efficient query mechanisms

    Arjun Nitin Bhagoji, Warren He, Bo Li, and Dawn Song. Practical black-box attacks on deep neural networks using efficient query mechanisms. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 154--169, 2018

  27. [27]

    Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learning

    Abhishek Bhowmick, John Duchi, Julien Freudiger, Gaurav Kapoor, and Ryan Rogers. Protection against reconstruction and its applications in private federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00984, 2018

  28. [28]

    Poisoning Attacks against Support Vector Machines

    Battista Biggio, Blaine Nelson, and Pavel Laskov. Poisoning attacks against support vector machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.6389, 2012

  29. [29]

    Adversarial biometric recognition: A review on biometric system security from the adversarial machine-learning perspective

    Battista Biggio, Paolo Russu, Luca Didaci, Fabio Roli, et al. Adversarial biometric recognition: A review on biometric system security from the adversarial machine-learning perspective. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 32 0 (5): 0 31--41, 2015

  30. [30]

    Pattern recognition and machine learning, volume 4

    Christopher M Bishop and Nasser M Nasrabadi. Pattern recognition and machine learning, volume 4. Springer, 2006

  31. [31]

    An overview of information-theoretic security and privacy: Metrics, limits and applications

    Matthieu Bloch, Onur G \"u nl \"u , Aylin Yener, Fr \'e d \'e rique Oggier, H Vincent Poor, Lalitha Sankar, and Rafael F Schaefer. An overview of information-theoretic security and privacy: Metrics, limits and applications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, 2 0 (1): 0 5--22, 2021

  32. [32]

    Architectural backdoors in neural networks

    Mikel Bober-Irizar, Ilia Shumailov, Yiren Zhao, Robert Mullins, and Nicolas Papernot. Architectural backdoors in neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 24595--24604, 2023

  33. [33]

    Secure face matching using fully homomorphic encryption

    Vishnu Naresh Boddeti. Secure face matching using fully homomorphic encryption. In 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS), pages 1--10. IEEE, 2018

  34. [34]

    The economic cost of publicly announced information security breaches: empirical evidence from the stock market

    Katherine Campbell, Lawrence A Gordon, Martin P Loeb, and Lei Zhou. The economic cost of publicly announced information security breaches: empirical evidence from the stock market. Journal of Computer security, 11 0 (3): 0 431--448, 2003

  35. [35]

    Poisoning web-scale training datasets is practical

    Nicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A Choquette-Choo, Daniel Paleka, Will Pearce, Hyrum Anderson, Andreas Terzis, Kurt Thomas, and Florian Tram \`e r. Poisoning web-scale training datasets is practical. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10149, 2023

  36. [36]

    Exploring connections between active learning and model extraction

    Varun Chandrasekaran, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Irene Giacomelli, Somesh Jha, and Songbai Yan. Exploring connections between active learning and model extraction. In 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 20), pages 1309--1326, 2020

  37. [37]

    Security without identification: Transaction systems to make big brother obsolete

    David Chaum. Security without identification: Transaction systems to make big brother obsolete. Communications of the ACM, 28 0 (10): 0 1030--1044, 1985

  38. [38]

    Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms

    David L Chaum. Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms. Communications of the ACM, 24 0 (2): 0 84--90, 1981

  39. [39]

    Advdiffuser: Natural adversarial example synthesis with diffusion models

    Xinquan Chen, Xitong Gao, Juanjuan Zhao, Kejiang Ye, and Cheng-Zhong Xu. Advdiffuser: Natural adversarial example synthesis with diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4562--4572, 2023

  40. [40]

    Secure multiparty computation

    Ronald Cramer, Ivan Bjerre Damg rd, et al. Secure multiparty computation. Cambridge University Press, 2015

  41. [41]

    Information-type measures of difference of probability distributions and indirect observation

    Imre Csisz \'a r. Information-type measures of difference of probability distributions and indirect observation. studia scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica, 2: 0 229--318, 1967

  42. [42]

    Information theory and statistics: A tutorial

    Imre Csisz \'a r, Paul C Shields, et al. Information theory and statistics: A tutorial. Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory , 1 0 (4): 0 417--528, 2004

  43. [43]

    Funck: Information funnels and bottlenecks for invariant representation learning

    Jo \ a o Machado de Freitas and Bernhard C Geiger. Funck: Information funnels and bottlenecks for invariant representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01446, 2022

  44. [44]

    Arcface: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition

    Jiankang Deng, Jia Guo, Niannan Xue, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Arcface: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition. In IEEE/CVF CVPR, 2019 a . doi:10.1109/CVPR.2019.00482

  45. [45]

    Lightweight face recognition challenge

    Jiankang Deng, Jia Guo, Debing Zhang, Yafeng Deng, Xiangju Lu, and Song Shi. Lightweight face recognition challenge. In IEEE/CVF ICCV Workshops, 2019 b

  46. [46]

    Calmon, and Lalitha Sankar

    Mario Diaz, Hao Wang, Flavio P. Calmon, and Lalitha Sankar. On the robustness of information-theoretic privacy measures and mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 66 0 (4): 0 1949--1978, 2019

  47. [47]

    New directions in cryptography

    Whitfield Diffie and Martin E Hellman. New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1976

  48. [48]

    A submodularity-based clustering algorithm for the information bottleneck and privacy funnel

    Ni Ding and Parastoo Sadeghi. A submodularity-based clustering algorithm for the information bottleneck and privacy funnel. In IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW), pages 1--5. IEEE, 2019

  49. [49]

    Asymptotic evaluation of certain markov process expectations for large time

    Monroe D Donsker and SR Srinivasa Varadhan. Asymptotic evaluation of certain markov process expectations for large time. iv. Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 36 0 (2): 0 183--212, 1983

  50. [50]

    Secure multi-party computation problems and their applications: a review and open problems

    Wenliang Du and Mikhail J Atallah. Secure multi-party computation problems and their applications: a review and open problems. In Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on New security paradigms, pages 13--22, 2001

  51. [51]

    Lecture notes for statistics 311/electrical engineering 377

    John Duchi. Lecture notes for statistics 311/electrical engineering 377. URL: https://stanford. edu/class/stats311/Lectures/full notes., 2, 2016

  52. [52]

    Local Privacy, Data Processing Inequalities, and Statistical Minimax Rates

    John C Duchi, Michael I Jordan, and Martin J Wainwright. Local privacy, data processing inequalities, and statistical minimax rates. arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.3203, 2013 a

  53. [53]

    Local privacy and statistical minimax rates

    John C Duchi, Michael I Jordan, and Martin J Wainwright. Local privacy and statistical minimax rates. In 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 429--438. IEEE, 2013 b

  54. [54]

    Privacy aware learning

    John C Duchi, Michael I Jordan, and Martin J Wainwright. Privacy aware learning. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 61 0 (6): 0 1--57, 2014

  55. [55]

    Minimax optimal procedures for locally private estimation

    John C Duchi, Michael I Jordan, and Martin J Wainwright. Minimax optimal procedures for locally private estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113 0 (521): 0 182--201, 2018

  56. [56]

    Deterring unauthorized access to computers: Controlling behavior in cyberspace through a contract law paradigm

    Robert L Dunne. Deterring unauthorized access to computers: Controlling behavior in cyberspace through a contract law paradigm. Jurimetrics J., 35: 0 1, 1994

  57. [57]

    Improved residual networks for image and video recognition

    Ionut Cosmin Duta, Li Liu, Fan Zhu, and Ling Shao. Improved residual networks for image and video recognition. In 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pages 9415--9422. IEEE, 2021

  58. [58]

    A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for iot

    Ashutosh Dhar Dwivedi, Gautam Srivastava, Shalini Dhar, and Rajani Singh. A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for iot. Sensors, 19 0 (2): 0 326, 2019

  59. [59]

    Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation

    Cynthia Dwork, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Frank McSherry, Ilya Mironov, and Moni Naor. Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation. In Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT 2006: 24th Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, St. Petersburg, Russia, May 28-June 1, 2006. Proceedings 25, pages 486--...

  60. [60]

    Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis

    Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, Kobbi Nissim, and Adam Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Theory of Cryptography Conference, pages 265--284. Springer, 2006 b

  61. [61]

    The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy

    Cynthia Dwork, Aaron Roth, et al. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science , 9 0 (3--4): 0 211--407, 2014

  62. [62]

    Exposed! a survey of attacks on private data

    Cynthia Dwork, Adam Smith, Thomas Steinke, and Jonathan Ullman. Exposed! a survey of attacks on private data. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4: 0 61--84, 2017

  63. [63]

    Censoring representations with an adversary

    Harrison Edwards and Amos Storkey. Censoring representations with an adversary. In International Conference on Learning Representation (ICLR), 2016

  64. [64]

    Robin Effing, Jos Van Hillegersberg, and Theo Huibers. Social media and political participation: are facebook, twitter and youtube democratizing our political systems? In Electronic Participation: Third IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2011, Delft, The Netherlands, August 29--September 1, 2011. Proceedings 3, pages 25--35. Springer, 2011

  65. [65]

    A systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data

    Khaled El Emam, Elizabeth Jonker, Luk Arbuckle, and Bradley Malin. A systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data. PloS one, 6 0 (12): 0 e28071, 2011

  66. [66]

    Limiting privacy breaches in privacy preserving data mining

    Alexandre Evfimievski, Johannes Gehrke, and Ramakrishnan Srikant. Limiting privacy breaches in privacy preserving data mining. In 22th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, pages 211--222. ACM, 2003

  67. [67]

    Learning robust representations via multi-view information bottleneck

    Marco Federici, Anjan Dutta, Patrick Forr \'e , Nate Kushman, and Zeynep Akata. Learning robust representations via multi-view information bottleneck. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020

  68. [68]

    Privacy-preserving image sharing via sparsifying layers on convolutional groups

    Sohrab Ferdowsi, Behrooz Razeghi, Taras Holotyak, Flavio P Calmon, and Slava Voloshynovskiy. Privacy-preserving image sharing via sparsifying layers on convolutional groups. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 2797--2801. IEEE, 2020

  69. [69]

    Zero knowledge proofs of identity

    Uriel Fiege, Amos Fiat, and Adi Shamir. Zero knowledge proofs of identity. In Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 210--217, 1987

  70. [70]

    The conditional entropy bottleneck

    Ian Fischer. The conditional entropy bottleneck. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05379, 2020

  71. [71]

    On the vulnerability of face verification systems to hill-climbing attacks

    Javier Galbally, Chris McCool, Julian Fierrez, Sebastien Marcel, and Javier Ortega-Garcia. On the vulnerability of face verification systems to hill-climbing attacks. Pattern Recognition, 43 0 (3): 0 1027--1038, 2010

  72. [72]

    The information bottleneck problem and its applications in machine learning

    Ziv Goldfeld and Yury Polyanskiy. The information bottleneck problem and its applications in machine learning. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, 2020

  73. [73]

    Secure multi-party computation

    Oded Goldreich. Secure multi-party computation. Manuscript. Preliminary version, 78 0 (110), 1998

  74. [74]

    Definitions and properties of zero-knowledge proof systems

    Oded Goldreich and Yair Oren. Definitions and properties of zero-knowledge proof systems. Journal of Cryptology, 7 0 (1): 0 1--32, 1994

  75. [75]

    Jointly de-biasing face recognition and demographic attribute estimation

    Sixue Gong, Xiaoming Liu, and Anil K Jain. Jointly de-biasing face recognition and demographic attribute estimation. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23--28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXIX 16, pages 330--347. Springer, 2020

  76. [76]

    Digital footprints: Predicting personality from temporal patterns of technology use

    Ted Grover and Gloria Mark. Digital footprints: Predicting personality from temporal patterns of technology use. In Proceedings of the 2017 acm international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing and proceedings of the 2017 acm international symposium on wearable computers, pages 41--44, 2017

  77. [77]

    The essential message: Claude Shannon and the making of information theory

    Erico Marui Guizzo. The essential message: Claude Shannon and the making of information theory. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003

  78. [78]

    Simple black-box adversarial attacks

    Chuan Guo, Jacob Gardner, Yurong You, Andrew Gordon Wilson, and Kilian Weinberger. Simple black-box adversarial attacks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2484--2493. PMLR, 2019

  79. [79]

    Practical poisoning attacks on neural networks

    Junfeng Guo and Cong Liu. Practical poisoning attacks on neural networks. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23--28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXVII 16, pages 142--158. Springer, 2020

  80. [80]

    Information bottleneck and its applications in deep learning

    Hassan Hafez-Kolahi and Shohreh Kasaei. Information bottleneck and its applications in deep learning. Algorithms, 3 0 (4): 0 5, 2019

Showing first 80 references.