REVIEW 2 cited by
Probing intractable beyond-standard-model parameter spaces armed with Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This article attempts to summarize the effort by the particle physics community in addressing the tedious work of determining the parameter spaces of beyond-the-standard-model (BSM) scenarios, allowed by data. These spaces, typically associated with a large number of dimensions, especially in the presence of nuisance parameters, suffer from the curse of dimensionality and thus render naive sampling of any kind -- even the computationally inexpensive ones -- ineffective. Over the years, various new sampling (from variations of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to dynamic nested sampling) and machine learning (ML) algorithms have been adopted by the community to alleviate this issue. If not all, we discuss potentially the most important among them and the significance of their results, in detail.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Normalizing Flow-Assisted Nested Sampling on Type-II Seesaw Model
A RealNVP normalizing flow trained inside nested sampling accelerates Bayesian scans of the Type-II seesaw parameter space and yields posterior constraints on scalar masses and couplings.
-
Amortized Inference of Multi-Modal Posteriors using Likelihood-Weighted Normalizing Flows
Training a normalizing flow on prior samples weighted by likelihood can approximate a posterior, but matching the base distribution's number of modes to the target is needed to avoid spurious bridges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.