REVIEW 1 cited by
Retrieving Examples from Memory for Retrieval Augmented Neural Machine Translation: A Systematic Comparison
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Neural Machine Translation (RAMT) architectures retrieve examples from memory to guide the generation process. While most works in this trend explore new ways to exploit the retrieved examples, the upstream retrieval step is mostly unexplored. In this paper, we study the effect of varying retrieval methods for several translation architectures, to better understand the interplay between these two processes. We conduct experiments in two language pairs in a multi-domain setting and consider several downstream architectures based on a standard autoregressive model, an edit-based model, and a large language model with in-context learning. Our experiments show that the choice of the retrieval technique impacts the translation scores, with variance across architectures. We also discuss the effects of increasing the number and diversity of examples, which are mostly positive across the board.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ViDove: A Translation Agent System with Multimodal Context and Memory-Augmented Reasoning
A multimodal, memory-augmented multi-agent system for video subtitling and translation, plus a new 17-hour benchmark, reports large BLEU/SubER gains on its own benchmark but not consistently on existing benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.