Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On computing approximate Lewis weights

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.02881 v1 pith:KKJIMG3Y submitted 2024-04-03 cs.DS math.OC

classification cs.DSmath.OC
keywords lewisapproximatesimpleweightsalgorithmapproximationapproximationscomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this note we provide and analyze a simple method that given an $n \times d$ matrix, outputs approximate $\ell_p$-Lewis weights, a natural measure of the importance of the rows with respect to the $\ell_p$ norm, for $p \geq 2$. More precisely, we provide a simple post-processing procedure that turns natural one-sided approximate $\ell_p$-Lewis weights into two-sided approximations. When combined with a simple one-sided approximation algorithm presented by Lee (PhD thesis, `16) this yields an algorithm for computing two-sided approximations of the $\ell_p$-Lewis weights of an $n \times d$-matrix using $\mathrm{poly}(d,p)$ approximate leverage score computations. While efficient high-accuracy algorithms for approximating $\ell_p$-Lewis had been established previously by Fazel, Lee, Padmanabhan and Sidford (SODA `22), the simple structure and approximation tolerance of our algorithm may make it of use for different applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. John Ellipsoids via Lazy Updates

    cs.DS 2025-01 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new lazy-update algorithm claims near-linear O(ε^{-1}nd log(n/d)) time for approximate John ellipsoids, but key proof steps and complexity accounting contain gaps.

Pith tools