Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Edisum: Summarizing and Explaining Wikipedia Edits at Scale

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.03428 v2 pith:TXMNCWAC submitted 2024-04-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords editsummarieswikipedialanguagemodeldataeditorshuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An edit summary is a succinct comment written by a Wikipedia editor explaining the nature of, and reasons for, an edit to a Wikipedia page. Edit summaries are crucial for maintaining the encyclopedia: they are the first thing seen by content moderators and they help them decide whether to accept or reject an edit. Additionally, edit summaries constitute a valuable data source for researchers. Unfortunately, as we show, for many edits, summaries are either missing or incomplete. To overcome this problem and help editors write useful edit summaries, we propose a model for recommending edit summaries generated by a language model trained to produce good edit summaries given the representation of an edit diff. To overcome the challenges of mixed-quality training data and efficiency requirements imposed by the scale of Wikipedia, we fine-tune a small generative language model on a curated mix of human and synthetic data. Our model performs on par with human editors. Commercial large language models are able to solve this task better than human editors, but are not well suited for Wikipedia, while open-source ones fail on this task. More broadly, we showcase how language modeling technology can be used to support humans in maintaining one of the largest and most visible projects on the Web.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. WikiSTAR: A System for Shedding Light on the Hidden History of Scientific Wikipedia Articles

    cs.CL 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    WikiSTAR tags scientifically meaningful Wikipedia revisions with an LLM multi-label taxonomy and interactive views so researchers can trace how scientific knowledge evolves in articles.

Pith tools