REVIEW 4 cited by
Joint Visual and Text Prompting for Improved Object-Centric Perception with Multimodal Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) such as GPT-4V and Gemini Pro face challenges in achieving human-level perception in Visual Question Answering (VQA), particularly in object-oriented perception tasks which demand fine-grained understanding of object identities, locations or attributes, as indicated by empirical findings. This is mainly due to their limited capability to effectively integrate complex visual cues with textual information and potential object hallucinations. In this paper, we present a novel approach, Joint Visual and Text Prompting (VTPrompt), that employs fine-grained visual information to enhance the capability of MLLMs in VQA, especially for object-oriented perception. VTPrompt merges visual and text prompts to extract key concepts from textual questions and employs a detection model to highlight relevant objects as visual prompts in images. The processed images alongside text prompts are subsequently fed into MLLMs to produce more accurate answers. Our experiments with GPT-4V and Gemini Pro, on three benchmarks, i.e., MME , MMB and POPE, demonstrate significant improvements. Particularly, our method led to a score improvement of up to 183.5 for GPT-4V on MME and enhanced MMB performance by 8.17\% for GPT-4V and 15.69\% for Gemini Pro.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
V2T-CoT: From Vision to Text Chain-of-Thought for Medical Reasoning and Diagnosis
V2T-CoT combines visual region grounding with LLM-generated text rationale training to improve medical visual question answering accuracy and interpretability on four benchmarks.
-
AutoV: Loss-Oriented Ranking for Visual Prompt Retrieval in LVLMs
AutoV selects instance- and query-specific visual prompts via loss-based pairwise ranking, consistently improving LVLMs across many benchmarks with no backbone fine-tuning.
-
Fast or Slow? Integrating Fast Intuition and Deliberate Thinking for Enhancing Visual Question Answering
FOCUS improves VQA accuracy by routing easy questions through fast zero-shot answering and hard questions through question-conditioned image segmentation before the final answer.
-
HSCR: Hierarchical Self-Contrastive Rewarding for Aligning Medical Vision Language Models
HSCR uses visual token dropout and logit contrast to construct self-generated dispreferred answers, then trains a medical VLM with explicit and implicit preference losses, improving zero-shot Rad-VQA, SLAKE, and PathV...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.